Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 6.0:ALTERNATIVES <br /> 6.5.1 Alternative Natural Gas Supply Pipeline Routes <br /> The preferred natural gas pipeline route would be adjacent to the existing 2.5-mile pipeline <br /> for the STIG Plant which is adjacent to the proposed LEC site. The existing gas pipeline exits <br /> the STIG plant approximately 400 ft to the south of the White Sough metering station and <br /> then turns east along the access road to the WPCF and under Interstate 5 (1-5). The pipeline <br /> continues east from I-5, along a utility easement,bordering several private agricultural <br /> fields until the intersection of De Vries Road and Armstrong Road. The pipeline then <br /> continues in an easement adjacent to the north side Armstrong Road to PG&E's high <br /> pressure natural gas pipeline#108. Due to the presence of the existing 2.5-mile gas pipeline, <br /> no other alternatives were analyzed. <br /> 6.5.2 Electrical Transmission System Alternatives <br /> The preferred transmission route would be to link the LEC site to the power grid through <br /> the existing STIG plant's 230-kV switchyard substation by a three-phase 230-kV <br /> transmission circuit. The proposed 230-kV route will exit the project site at the northwest <br /> corner and will extend along the northern border of the STIG plant before turning south <br /> along the eastern boundary of the STIG plant and continuing to the existing 230-kV <br /> switchyard.From the switchyard,the line will tie into the PG&E 230 kV transmission <br /> corridor. Due to the presence of the existing electrical switchyard adjacent to the LEC site, <br /> no other alternatives were analyzed. <br /> 6.5.3 Water Supply Alternatives <br /> The LEC project will connect with the WPCF for supplies of recycled water for cooling <br /> through a utility corridor linking the power plant and WPCF. Other sources of cooling <br /> water might include potable water from an onsite well used to supply potable water to LEC, <br /> or the potable water from the WPCF onsite well. Reclaimed water is clearly the better <br /> alternative because it provides for beneficial use for treated wastewater which might <br /> otherwise be wasted. Using potable water from the onsite well would involve consuming <br /> large quantities of scarce fresh water for power plant cooling that could be more beneficially <br /> used for other purposes. <br /> 6.6 Technology Alternatives <br /> The configuration of the LEC was selected from a wide array of technology alternatives. <br /> These include generation technology alternatives,fuel technology alternatives,combustion <br /> turbine alternatives,NOX control alternatives. <br /> 6.6.1 Generation Technology Alternatives <br /> Selection of the power generation technology focused on those technologies that can utilize <br /> the natural gas readily available from the existing transmission system. Following is a <br /> discussion of the suitability of such technologies for application to the LEC. <br /> 6.6.1.1 Conventional Boiler and Steam Turbine <br /> This technology burns fuel in the furnace of a conventional boiler to create steam. The steam <br /> is used to drive a steam turbine-generator,and the steam is then condensed and returned to <br /> 6-14 SAC/371322/082330003(LEC_6.0_ALTERNATIVES.DOC) <br />