My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0528038
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 9:54:09 AM
Creation date
9/26/2019 8:57:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0528038
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0018998
FACILITY_NAME
NCPA LODI ENERGY CENTER
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95242
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1626
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.9 PUBLIC HEALTH <br /> Gas Association has determined to be acceptable, as well as being below the ACGIH17 <br /> TLV 18 and STEL 19 values of 25 and 35 ppm respectively (adopted 2003). Therefore, <br /> potential ammonia emissions would not create a significant odor. Other combustion <br /> contaminants are not present at concentrations that could produce a significant odor. <br /> 5.9.4.8 Electromagnetic Field Exposure <br /> LEC will connect to the existing NCPA switchyard next to the existing NCPA power plant. <br /> The project will include additional onsite electric power handling transformers and <br /> associated equipment,which are discussed in more detail in Section 3.0. Based on recent <br /> findings of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS, 1999), <br /> electromagnetic field exposures from the electric power handling equipment would not <br /> result in a significant impact on public health. The NIEHS report to the U.S. Congress found <br /> that"the probability that EMF exposure is truly a health hazard is currently small. The weak <br /> epidemiological associations and lack of any laboratory support for these associations <br /> provide only marginal scientific support that exposure to this agent is causing any degree of <br /> harm"(NIEH 1999). <br /> 5.9.4.9 Summary of Impacts <br /> Results from the health risk assessment based on emissions modeling indicate that there will <br /> be no significant incremental public health risks from construction or operation of the <br /> proposed project. Results from criteria pollutant modeling for routine operations indicate <br /> that potential ambient concentrations of NO2, CO,SO2, and PM10 would not exceed ambient <br /> air quality standards,with the exception of the state PM10 and PM2.5 standards. For these <br /> pollutants, existing 24-hour and annual average PM10 and PM2.5 background concentrations <br /> already exceed applicable standards,while the project would not add a significant <br /> contribution. The ambient air quality standards protect public health with a margin of safety <br /> for the most sensitive subpopulations (Section 5.1). <br /> 5.9.5 Cumulative Effects <br /> An analysis of potential cumulative air quality impacts that may result from the LEC and <br /> other reasonably foreseeable projects is required by the CEC. The following requirements <br /> for other projects to qualify for cumulative air quality impact analysis were submitted to the <br /> SJVAPCD in a request letter on June 19,2008: <br /> • Projects located within a six-mile radius of the LEC project site;and <br /> • Projects issued a new Authority to Construct permit after July 1,2007 <br /> The SJVAPCD responded with a list,from which one facility potentially satisfied these <br /> requirements.20 As indicated in the District's letter.The applicant has now applied to install <br /> a different engine than the one for which the ATC was issued, and no information is yet <br /> available regarding the engine that will actually be installed. Therefore,the only required <br /> cumulative impacts analysis for either criteria pollutants or TACs is an evaluation of the <br /> 17 American Congress of Government Industrial Hygienists <br /> 18 Threshold Limit Value <br /> 19 Short-Term Exposure Level <br /> 20 Copies of the correspondence with the District is provided in Appendix 5.1 G. <br /> 5.9-20 SAC/371322/082340007(LEC_5.9_PUBLIC_HEALTH.DOC) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.