Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT F:MAPS AND CROSS SECTIONS OF GEOLOGIC STRUCTURE OF AREA <br /> former Rio Vista Gas Field,located 12 to 15 miles to the northwest of the STIG-LEC facility <br /> (Trautz et al,2007). <br /> The STIG-1 well boring intentionally did not penetrate the bottom of the unit. Based on the <br /> isopach map (Figure F-12),the estimated thickness of the Capay Formation is 150 feet. <br /> Seismic Activity <br /> The general region that surrounds the STIG#1 proposed injection site is characterized by a <br /> very low level of seismic activity. No active faults are mapped within 25 miles of this site. <br /> As shown in Figure F-13,the most recent earthquake nearby occurred on the Greenville <br /> Fault,located approximately 30 miles west of STIG #1 (Jennings and Saucedo, 1999). The <br /> Antioch Fault,another potentially active fault,is located near the Greenville Fault. No other <br /> known active faults are located within 50 miles of the site. <br /> The potential shaking hazard resulting from seismic activity near the site is estimated from <br /> information available on the California Geological Survey Web site <br /> (http://redirect.conservation.ca. og v/cgs/rghm/pshamag/pshamain.html). The STIG-LEC <br /> facility is located in an area that can expect between 10 to 20 percent peak ground <br /> acceleration. This is a relatively low seismic shaking potential. <br /> In addition to the review of active local and regional faults, existing information on <br /> subsurface faulting of the injection formation and the upper and lower confining units was <br /> assessed using DOGGR maps and cross-sections of existing oil and gas fields (DOGGR <br /> 1982). Based on cross sections constructed through the Lodi Airport and Harte gas fields (3 <br /> and 4-1/2 miles southeast from the STIG-LEC site,respectively),local faulting in both areas <br /> is assumed (Figure F-14). Based on the productive history of these sites,the faults created <br /> structural traps for local hydrocarbons and,therefore, are likely not conduits of gas or fluid <br /> migration.Faults are not known to be present within the AOR,based on local geophysical <br /> log information used to develop the Domengine Formation structural map for the 1993 <br /> permit (Figure F-10). <br /> SAC/371322/082550021(ATTACH MENT-F.DOC) F-5 <br />