Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment A <br /> Area of Review Methods <br /> Application Requirements <br /> Give the methods and,if appropriate,the calculations used to determine the size of the Area <br /> of Review (fixed radius or equation). The area of review shall be a fixed radius of 1/4-mile <br /> from the well bore,unless the use of an equation is approved in advance by the Director. <br /> Approach <br /> A single Area of Review (AOR) was developed for the STIG-LEC facility wells because of <br /> the relatively small dimensions of the overall site. The AOR considered the maximum <br /> potential injection rates for the STIG-1 and LEC-1 wells over the next 30 years (the life <br /> expectancy of the power plants). This approach provided the'worst case scenario' for <br /> assessing potential impacts of the injection process over time because it focused the injection <br /> on two wells. Results for 10 years,the duration of the permit request,are also considered. <br /> Although specific assessment of injection at LEC-2 was not directly conducted,its role as a <br /> backup well was considered as part of the overall injection scheme at the STIG-LEC. <br /> Methodology <br /> Three independent methods are available to decide the appropriate size of the area to be <br /> surveyed to assess the possible impact of the proposed use of an injection well on <br /> underground sources of drinking water (USDWs). Those methods are the fixed radius <br /> method,the volumetric method,and the pressure build-up method. The results from <br /> applying each of those methods to determine an appropriate-sized AOR for the NCPA <br /> STIG-LEC facility are described below. <br /> It was assumed that the fully permitted injection rates for the STIG-1 (200 gallons per <br /> minute [gpm]) and LEC-1 (225 gpm) wells were achieved 24 hours per day,365 days per <br /> year for the next 30 years. Injection was assumed to occur from a single point located at the <br /> center of the facility. <br /> Formation properties used for the calculations were taken from the original permit <br /> application and subsequent testing activities performed during mechanical integrity testing <br /> (MIT). Original data for the permit was collected through research on nearby wells, <br /> geophysical logging,and injection testing. Permeability is one of the parameters critical for <br /> determining long term pressure increases. Due to the nature of evaluating pressure response <br /> to injection,combined with minor differences in testing procedures and initial reservoir <br /> conditions,results of the tests have varied as shown in Table A-1. The original value of <br /> permeability and net sand thickness based on perforated intervals was selected to provide <br /> the most conservative estimated distances for the AOR. <br /> SAC/371322/082550016(ATTACHMENT-A.DOC) A-1 <br />