My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VICTOR
>
1220
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009056
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2019 9:07:45 AM
Creation date
10/3/2019 8:43:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009056
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004059
FACILITY_NAME
LODI DOOR & METAL CO
STREET_NUMBER
1220
STREET_NAME
VICTOR
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1220 VICTOR RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0/LDC INSPECTION -2- 7 June 1990 <br /> analyzing for nickel and zinc in the soil remaining in the impoundment. He didn't <br /> think there would be a problem with discharging the water into the sewer. <br /> I asked Mr. Pletcher to send us the lab results for the samples when he received them. <br /> When Mr. Schafer left the site, the monitoring well sampling continued. Each of the <br /> remaining wells was sampled in the same manner: The depth to water was measured and <br /> the casing volumes calculated. Each well was purged (with a Well Wizard dedicated pump <br /> system) a minimum of three well volumes and until pH, EC, and TDS stabilized. After <br /> purging, a 0.45 micron filter was attached to the discharge line. The samples were <br /> then collected in plastic bottles. The samples collected for metals analysis contained <br /> HNO, as a preservative. I collected split samples from monitoring wells MW-1 , MW-2, <br /> MW-3, and MW-5 for separate analysis. <br /> The water from monitoring well MW-2 was very cloudy and contained a lot of sediment. <br /> Mr. Pletcher stated that that was normal for the well . The water cleared up some while <br /> purging, but not completely. <br /> SAMPLE RESULTS <br /> The laboratory results of the samples collected by RSI are as follows: <br /> Constituent Units MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 MW-6 <br /> Arsenic mg/l 0.013 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.008 0.004 <br /> Chromium (tot. ) mg/l 0.09 0.031 0.005 <0.005 0.006 <0.005 <br /> Iron mg/l <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <br /> Lead mg/l 0.005 0.007 0.005 <0.005 0.005 <0.005 <br /> Manganese mg/l <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.011 <br /> Nickel mg/l <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <br /> Vanadium mg/l <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <br /> Zinc mg/l <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0. 18 <br /> Alk. Tot. (CaCO,) mg/l 220 280 180 140 160 110 <br /> PH std. 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.3 7.8 <br /> EC µmhos/cm 650 810 550 500 510 310 <br /> TDS mg/l 390 480 340 310 320 200 <br /> The laboratory results of the samples collected by the Regional Board are as follows: <br /> Constituent Units MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 MW-6 <br /> Arsenic mg/1 0.012 0.002 NA 0.003 0.007 NA <br /> Chromium (tot. ) mg/l 0.082 0.030 NA 0.002 0.004 NA <br /> Nickel mg/l <0.001 <0.001 NA <0.001 <0.001 NA <br /> TDS mg/l 381 425 NA 252 306 NA <br /> NA = not analyzed <br /> Concentrations in mg/l <br /> Laboratory reports and chains of custody are attached. The results of the split <br /> samples are in good agreement. It appears both laboratories are performing well . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.