My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
5000
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540507
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2019 3:52:33 PM
Creation date
10/4/2019 3:50:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0540507
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023167
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON METRO AIRPORT FORMER FUEL FARM
STREET_NUMBER
5000
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17726034
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
5000 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE 1 -CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> Site Name and Location: Stockton Metropolitan Airport, 5000 S.Airport Way, Stockton, San Joaquin County(RB#390227) <br /> Y1 1. Distance to production wells for municipal, A 2015 sensitive receptor survey reported two(2)municipal water <br /> domestic, agriculture, industry and other uses supply wells located within 2,000'of the Site. The nearest well is <br /> within 2000 feet of the site. 350'southwest(up-gradient). The remaining well is 1,800' <br /> northwest(cross-gradient) The water supply wells were sampled in <br /> 1984(40 years after the USTs were installed), all results were non- <br /> detect. <br /> Y 2. Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing In 8/87, 2/88, 2/90, 3/90, and 6/97, 16 USTs were removed from the <br /> locations of any former and existing tank Fuel Farm. Table 1 of the Closure Memo provides dates removed <br /> systems, excavation contours and sample and details of the USTs. Site maps and figures showing tanks <br /> locations, boring and monitoring well elevation location, excavations, building and residual pollutants were <br /> contours,gradients, and nearby surface waters, provided in investigation reports. <br /> building , streets, and subsurface utilities; <br /> Y 3. Figures depicting lithology(cross Site lithology consists of clay, silt and sand to 104', the total depth <br /> section), treatment system diagrams; investigated. An engineered remediation system was not required by the <br /> regulatory agency. <br /> N 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or Approximately 350 yd soil was excavated 6/97. The fate of soil and the mass <br /> off-site disposal(quantity); estimate for excavated soil was not provided in the available reports. <br /> P5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site, Site monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-8 were-properly destroyed on <br /> e; 18 November 2015. <br /> 6. Tabulated results of all groundwater Tabulated data was provided in reports indicating depth to groundwater varied <br /> elevations and depths to water, from 32'bgs to 51'bgs. Groundwater flow direction was predominantly <br /> towards the northwest. <br /> Y 7. Tabulated results of all sampling All data was tabulated in various reports. Lead sampling was conducted as part of <br /> and analyses: the UST removal activities.Results appear to be representative of naturally <br /> Y❑ Detection limits for occurring levels of lead in soil and groundwater. <br /> confirmation sampling <br /> El Lead analyses <br /> FY7 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in The horizontal and vertical extent of the <br /> soil and groundwater, and both on-site and off-site: TPH pollution is about 250'laterally and <br /> 104'vertically. <br /> Y❑Lateral and IEVertical extent of soil contamination <br /> Y Lateral and Vertical extent of groundwater contamination <br /> Y 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface No active remediation was performed. <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and <br /> groundwater remediation system; <br /> 10.Reports/informationFY] Unauthorized Release Form ❑Y QMRs(35) 11/02 to 4/14 <br /> ❑Y Well and boring logs❑Y PAR ❑ FRP ❑Y Other Closure Requests, 6/12&/6/14 <br /> Y 11.Best Available Technology(BAT)used or Leak was stopped by removing tanks and piping(BAT). <br /> an explanation for not using BAT; <br /> Unable <br /> Reasons why background was/is not Residual soil pollution does not pose a threat to human health and <br /> UUnable usin BAT, groundwater pollution is predicted to be restored in 5 years. <br /> N 13.Mass balance calculation of substance Initial mass and residual mass estimates were not provided. <br /> treated versus that remaining; <br /> Y 14. Assumptions, parameters, calculations The site meets the State Water Board's Low Threat Closure Policy <br /> and model used in risk assessments,and criteria and the Consultant states site does not represent a significant <br /> fate and transport modeling; environmental or health risk. <br /> Y 15. Rationale why conditions remaining at Soil and groundwater pollution is limited in extent. Land use is not <br /> site will not adversely impact water quality, expected to change in the foreseeable future. Groundwater plume is <br /> health, or other beneficial uses;and stable and slowly decreasing in concentration. <br /> By: JLB Comments:Sixteen (16) USTs, including 15 installed between 1942-1945 by the US Army Air Corps that <br /> supported pilot training during WWII, were used to store gasoline, diesel and jet fuel and were removed from <br /> Date: 9/29/15 the Airport tank farm. Based on the stable and declining concentrations in groundwater, no foreseeable <br /> changes in land use, and no risks to human health from direct exposure soil, Regional Board staff concur <br /> with closure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.