Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kirk Moon -2- 16 July 1990 <br /> U. S. Chemical Company <br /> The four locations numbered 5, 6, 7, and 8 may be composited if indeed the <br /> sludge is no more than a few inches thick, however, the complete suite of <br /> tests need to be performed. We think it likely that the two stratified <br /> samples from two locations near the discharge pipe probably contain the <br /> highest concentrations of metals, minerals and organics. <br /> 4. The detection limit must be sufficiently low enough to identify the <br /> potential constituents. Costly sampling and analysis yielding non-detect <br /> values higher than water quality criteria are not useful to the Board and <br /> should be avoided. Also, sufficient sample volume should be taken to <br /> allow the laboratory room for additional runs if matrix interference is <br /> projected and allow analysis at acceptable detection levels. <br /> 5. The workplan indicates that the samples will not be taken beyond 2 inches <br /> of the clay liner. If the liner is 'clean' , assurance that the waste will <br /> not be diluted with liner material is necessary. If the clay liner with <br /> ten years of use has become completely saturated with waste constituents <br /> it then it becomes a waste itself and needs characterization. <br /> 6. The 13 chemical groups listed and the group of dyes and scents are <br /> possible wastewater constituents. The proposed wastewater sampling <br /> includes two samples form the surface impoundment and five samples from <br /> the sump on five consecutive days. The sump sampling needs to be <br /> scheduled when the waste stream is representative of the processing <br /> schedule that would include the chemical groups that have been <br /> historically impounded. <br /> 7. A chemical comparison of wastewater collected in the sump and the <br /> wastewater within the surface impoundment should be tabulated and compared <br /> to allow evaluation of volatilization. <br /> The aquatic toxicity testing the California Department of Health Services (DHS) <br /> performed on the liquids and sludge from the surface impoundment indicate that <br /> the sludge within the surface impoundment exceeds the hazardous criteria. The <br /> identification of what specific constituent or combination of constituents makes <br /> the sludge/wastewater fail the toxicity criteria for hazardous wastes is not <br /> addressed in the present work plan. If a hazardous/non-hazardous waste re- <br /> determination is desired the Waste Evaluation Unit within the California State <br /> Department of Health Services must be contacted, and may require more stringent <br /> analysis than that proposed in the 2 July 1990 work plan. <br /> It is anticipated that the technical report that will be generated by sampling <br /> of the waste stream and surface impoundment will satisfy the waste <br /> characterization requirements of the TPCA Hydrogeological Assessment Report. In <br /> addition, please submit for our review the preliminary laboratory data when the <br /> laboratory supplies the results of the testing. <br />