Laserfiche WebLink
WILLIAM A. SCHUCKMAN <br />JUDITH A. FEINBERG <br />CERTIFIED PARALEGAL <br />LAW OFFICES OF <br />WIT.T.T a M- A. SC:EUC%---1AN <br />3031 WEST MARCH LANE <br />SUITE 123 SOUTH <br />STOC=021 . CALIFORNIA 95219-6500 <br />May 8, 2000 <br />David J. Irey <br />Deputy District Attorney <br />Environmental Prosecutions Unit <br />Post Office Box 990 <br />Stockton, CA 95201 <br />Re: People vs. Eddie's Pizza Cafe, et al. <br />San Joaquin Superior Court No: CV 008909 <br />Dear Mr. Irev: <br />TELEPHONE (209) 472-110C <br />FAX (209) 472-IC79 <br />Via Facsimile Transmittal <br />This office has been retained to represent Proprietary Pizza and George Badway in <br />connection with a lawsuit filed by you relating to his use of carbon dioxide at the pizza parlors. I <br />phoned your office on May 3, May 4 and May nth but have received no call back. <br />We would like to preliminarily resolve two issues: <br />1. The date on which pleadings are due from the defense. A review of the file indicates <br />that the complaint was fled and served some time ago but that negotiations have been ongoing. <br />Unless I hear from you to the contrary in writing, I will assume that responsive pleadings may be <br />timelv filed at anv time through Mav 30th. <br />2. Your complaint is fatally ambiguous in that it pleads alternative measures of quantity <br />alleged to trigger certain safety plan requirements. Such disjunctive pleadings are inherently vague <br />and ambiguous and subject to demurrer. Rather than go through that drill, I propose that you simply <br />advise me which of the numerous alternative units you are actually alleging. We can then file a <br />stipulated amendment clarifyina that issue. Please advise. <br />WAS/jf <br />CC: Mr. George Badway <br />Yours very truly, <br />WILLIAM A. SCHUCKMAN <br />ftxHIBIT <br />�yE <br />