Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />A <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />Plaintiffs' counsel needs to be convinced that he has no such influence on this Court and any <br />suggestion that he does is most inappropriate. <br />Considering the severity of his implication, he may be subject to disqualification but for now <br />an appropriate fine having some relationship to his earnings seems appropriate. <br />In addition, all references to other cases should be expressly stricken from his Opposition <br />I Brief <br />CONCLUSION <br />The special demurrer should be granted on the basis of the conceded issue and the failure to <br />allege that the resulting allegation of a trivial amount of Carbon Dioxide meets the Labor Code § <br />6382 threshold. <br />DATED: July 6, 2000 <br />Respectfully submjfte- <br />WILLIAM A. SCHUCKMAN <br />Defendants Reply to Opposition to Special Demurrer <br />and Memorandum in Support thereof <br />-3- <br />