SU0012600 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ISSUES: Potential) Less Than Less Than Analyzed Potentially Significant with Significant Mitigation Significant No In The Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Prior EIR I. AESTHETICS. Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publically ❑ accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Impact Discussion: a-c) The proposed project is located on South 'B' Street and South 'D' Street in the urban community of Stockton. Pursuant to San Joaquin County General Plan 2035 Natural and Cultural Resources Element Figure NCRA (page 3.4-13), neither South 'B' Street nor South 'D' Street in Stockton are designated as a Scenic Route.Therefore the project will not impact a scenic vista or zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. d) The proposed project is an expansion to an existing religious assembly.The existing facility has parking for 512 vehicles with outdoor lighting throughout. Outdoor lighting is conditioned to be designed to confine direct rays to the premises, allowing no spillover beyond the property lines.The proposed expansion will add fourteen (14) parking stalls to the site. Any new lighting will be similarly conditioned therefore, the project is expected to have a less than significant impact on light or glare. PA-1800106 (RAA, UP)—Initial Study 5