My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LODI
>
204
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544962
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2019 9:34:10 AM
Creation date
11/6/2019 9:27:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0544962
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003651
FACILITY_NAME
ARTS & ARTISTS
STREET_NUMBER
204
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LODI
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04719102
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
204 E LODI AVE
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> 4 March 1992 <br /> (GeoAudit CV 30-34E3-1.47) <br /> Page. 2 of 4 <br /> GROUNDWATER GRADIENT <br /> In 1987 , the groundwater gradient was to the north-northeast during.• <br /> both;,sampling events performed by Weiss Environmental. MW-1 was the <br /> only.; one of three monitoring wells that would have been down- <br /> gradient from the former tank cavity. The present situation is <br /> unclear, because the depth of 60. 12 ft in MW-1, as reported by <br /> Earth Systems Environmental, is at or just below the level of the <br /> bottom perforations in MW-2 and MW-3 (60 ft and 59 ft, <br /> respectively) . If water levels at the locations of MW-2 and MW-3 <br /> are just below the perforated intervals, at perhaps 60. 05 and 60. 10 <br /> ft, these wells would still be up-gradient from MW-1 but would be <br /> too shallow to encounter the water table. This possibility is not <br /> unlikely, since the water levels in MW-1 and MW-3 were within 0. 03 <br /> ft of each other during both sampling events in 1987 , and the level <br /> in the up-gradient well (MW-2) was 0. 4 to 0. 6 ft above those in the <br /> other wells. <br /> Due to the uncertainty of the groundwater gradient, San Joaquin <br /> County EHD has requested that at least two additional- monitoring <br /> wells be installed to measure the present gradient and to determine <br /> FT the ,lateral extent of soil and groundwater contamination. In <br /> addition, the County has asked that a plan to remove the floating <br /> product from MW-1 be included. <br /> PROPOSED WELL LOCATIONS <br /> We propose to -insta1-1 one 'monitoring -well °north of MW-1, and -a <br /> 'second-well near MW-2 to determine whether groundwater in this up- <br /> Lgradient position is still__contaminated. (Figure 2) Details of the <br /> drilling and sampling procedures are provided on the following <br /> pages. <br /> 1) Notify the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division <br /> (SJEHD) 48 hours prior to work initiation. <br /> 2) Drill two monitoring wells using truck-mounted, continuous- <br /> flight, 8-inch diameter hollow-stem augers using the well <br /> design depicted in Figure 3 . <br /> 3) Obtain discrete soil samples at rtefoot intervals ' in each <br /> boring, n- <br /> ' using a split-tube sampler loaded with three-pre--, <br /> ", cleaned brass tubes. <br /> 4) Decontaminate sampling equipment in a tri-sodium phosphate <br /> solution (TSP) and rinse twice with water prior to each <br /> sampling run. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.