Laserfiche WebLink
28 April 1995 <br /> AGE-NC-95-0112 <br />' Page 2of4 <br /> To further delineate the extent of the dissolved hydrocarbons plume the f HS/EHD required <br /> three additional wells, resulting in installation of MW-G, MW-7, and MW-8 by GeoAudit <br /> in April 1993. Two soil samples were analyzed from each pilot borings of these wells; one <br />' from the current and the former capillary fringe at 55 and 45 feet, respectively. No <br /> petroleuin hydrocarbons were detected in ally of the soil saillples analyzed. `Fater samples <br /> from these newly installed wells did not indicate the detection of hydrocarbons at that tinge. <br /> In order to access the soil directly beneath the former UST, boring RW-1 was installed in <br /> August 1993. This well was drilled at a 150 angle fl-oln vertical from a surface location near <br />' the southeast corner of the building, and completed as a 4-inch diameter remediation well. <br /> TPH-g wm <br /> as detected in soil samples at concentrations as high as 12,000 ppm at a depth of <br />' 35 feet. <br /> A Final Remedial Plan (FRP) was prepared by GeoAudit ill July 1994. The FRP outlined <br /> soil and ground Water remediation procedures toi• the Site. However, Implementation of the <br /> 1 FRP had been delayed because of access difficulties with the owner, of the Ilelgllborima <br /> property (the property is currently operated as an A W restaurant). <br /> 3.0. SCOPE OF WORK <br /> Qllar'tel'ly 117on1t01'lila of groundwater at the site was initiated by GeoAudit ill October 1992. <br /> Concentrations of hydrocarbons ]la\'e flllCtlllted Ill I%IW-1 and I' IW-4. Hydi-ocalboils have <br /> beeIl intermittently detected at very 1o1,,' levels ill ININV-5 and NMI-7. No hydrocai"bolls leave <br /> been detected 111 i%'11V-6 or INMI-8 slilce installation in April 1993. NNVIS i�'I�V-� alld it'I1V-3 <br /> ha�re relllailled circ' and have not been sampled since 19ST <br /> 'I'he scope of work is to further comply with the quarterly monitoring requirements. The <br /> field work for this report was performed by GeoAudit. <br /> 4.0. PROCEDURES <br /> 4.1. MONITORING l l PURGE PROCEDURES <br /> 1 . _r <br /> 011411� liiiaiy-26;-1'995,`6e aroundwater deptir-was=ineasilred -using a Solinst=Water--level._..-ID <br /> -. . �- . ._•..=-=- <br /> meter. After depth lneasul-erllents were made, PVC bailers were used to purge three well <br /> from MW-4, MW-5, MW-6, 14\V-7 alld MW-8. Because of poor recharge, three <br /> ' well volumes could not be removed from MW-1. Ground water stabilization parameters <br /> were measured at olle-gallon intervals using an ICM water analyzer. Purge water was stored <br /> in 55-gallon drums on-site. Field data sheets are included.in Appendix A. <br />