My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0080847 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BLUESTONE
>
4219
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0080847 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 8:55:12 AM
Creation date
11/7/2019 9:49:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0080847
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
4219
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
BLUESTONE
STREET_TYPE
CT
City
ACAMPO
Zip
95220
APN
00536009
ENTERED_DATE
7/3/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
4219 E BLUESTONE CT
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
S = Sufficient <br />I = Insufficient <br />6.0 PERCOLATION TEST INFORMATION SECTION <br />Er 0 6.1 Site map showing the location, with concise and accurate dimensions of the percolation test holes on the parcel. <br />Er El 6.2 The minimum number of shallow and deep percolation tests was performed for each parcel. <br />Er El 6.3 Description of the date, time and protocol used to prepare the test hole, including depth and dimensions of hole, <br />preparation of hole, apd dept);1 of water used to presoak (minimum 12 inches). <br />6.4 6 Description of the date, time and condition of the test hole after the 24-hour soak period (hole still intact, hole dry, <br />depth to water remaining in hole, etc.) 7:33 -. <br />El/ 0 6.5 The test conformed to SJC Policy EHD 02-02 (correct depth, diameter, 2" gravel, 6" water refill, correct readings <br />recorded). <br />0 6.6 Complete Percolation Test Form (including readings) was provided with REHS verification signature. The rate <br />was correctly calculated using the last reading. <br />Er 0 6.7 Discussion of any potential problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or alternative septic system. <br />0 6.8 Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future leach fields needed at the site. <br />7.0 CONCLUSION SECTION <br />Ef 7.1 The report was signed and stamped by the appropriately registered individual <br />Reviewed By: 6C3 Reviewed Date: <br />Pan, nf
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.