Laserfiche WebLink
SANJOAQUIN <br />-) _COUNTY <br />\\7`4P:/ Greatness grows here. <br />Environmental Health Deoartment <br />4.6 Identify the maximum daily volume of wastewater generated from all fixtures at the site, using the <br />full build out of the project. (phased projects can use phased approach but must include <br />information for each phase to full potential build out). 7 <br /> <br />5.0 SITE EVALUATION INFORMATION <br />5.1 Flooding, thickness/depth of vadose zone, lithology of vadose zone, percolation testing results = <br />permeability of soils, slope, rock outcrops, site topography <br />5.2 Soil profile through borings, excavations <br />5.2.1 Site map showing the location, with dimensions, of the soil profile pit on the parcel. <br />5.2.2 Description of soil profile pit including depth and dimensions. / <br />5.2.3 Description of soil lithology, soil texture, structure, color, and saturation - (Page 31-34 <br />EPA DM) <br />5.2.4 Discussion of any potential problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or <br />alternative septic system. / <br />5.3 Percolation Testing <br />5.3.1 Permit obtained <br />5.3.2 The test conformed to SJC Policy EHD 02-02 (correct depth, diameter, 2" gravel, 6" water he' <br />refill, correct readings recorded). (make sure all items on check list are included here) <br />5.3.2.1 Description of the date, time and protocol used to prepare the test hole, including w" <br />depth and dimensions of hole, preparation of hole, and depth of water used to <br />presoak (minimum 12 inches). <br />5.3.2.2 Description of the date, time and condition of the test hole after the 24-hour soak 4,-1 <br />period (hole still intact, hole dry, depth to water remaining in hole, etc.) <br />5.3.2.3 Complete Percolation Test Form (including readings) was provided with REHS <br />verification signature. The rate was correctly calculated using the last reading. <br />5.3.2.4 <br />5.3.3 Perc rate compared to estimated hydraulic characteristics table (Page 39 EPA DM). If not <br />comparable need to determine why. <br />5.3.4 Perc rate compared to Table 1.10.1 SJC Standards for minimum depth to water and <br />standard or engineered system to determine appropriate/adequate wastewater loading <br />area <br />5.3.5 Site map showing the location, with concise and accurate dimensions of the percolation <br />test holes on the parcel. <br />5.3.6 The minimum number of shallow and deep percolation tests was performed for each <br />parcel. (specify what is required) <br />5.3.7 Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future leach <br />fields needed at the site. (use what to determine dispersal area?) <br />5.4 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br />5.5 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate ,2 <br />and/or any other constituent of concern identified for the project site. Use EPA DM or WA State <br />info <br />5.6 <br /> <br />6.0 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION <br />6.1 Depth to water data for wells within 2 miles of the site 7 <br />Use Casgem: https://www.casgem.water.ca.gov/OSSAS(srvaClissbtqyznmsohafqvlm))/Defaultaspx?ReturnUrlqoss <br />Use Geotracker: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ <br />6.2 Identify current depth to water and date measured. I <br />6.3 Identify highest depth to water and date measured. <br />6.4 Identify general gradient and direction of groundwater flow, based on actual data, cite source of <br />data. <br />EHD 26-02-002 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br />Nitrate Loading Study Checklist <br />7/14/2003