Laserfiche WebLink
ground-water aquifer, it is possible that any remaining surface contaminants may be <br /> transported to the first saturated zone of the aquifer. <br /> First ground water is predicted at 87 to 95 feet below ground surface for this Site; �_ s <br /> consequently, significant nitrate reduction would be anticipated as the septic effluent <br /> percolates downward. <br /> Clay soils, like those found on the Site, are known to restrict downward movement of <br /> water, and may provide nitrogen reduction through adhesion to the soil particles. <br /> Sources of Nitrate <br /> Dairies, orchards that require fertilization in sandy soils, and septic systems have been <br /> found to be the most significant sources of nitrate in ground water. <br /> Percolating Recharge Waters <br /> One of the most determinant factors in the Hantzsche and Finnemore equation is the <br /> rate of recharge from percolating waters, which mix with the downward-percolating <br /> effluent generated by on-site septic systems. In the original Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> paper, only "average recharge rate of rainfall" was considered. For the Chico area, <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore present an average rainfall of 22.5 inches per year and an <br /> estimated recharge of 16.8 inches per year. <br /> Based on San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department policy (personal <br /> communication, March 18, 2019), the recharge input for the Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> equation should be derived from average monthly precipitation of rainfall and <br /> evapotranspiration rates for the area; the data should be obtained from the California <br /> Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS), preferably from stations located <br /> within San Joaquin County. Recharge is calculated by first determining whether the <br /> average monthly precipitation exceeds average monthly potential evapotranspiration. If <br /> so, then the difference is the percolating recharge water into the aquifer. Runoff and <br /> stream infiltration drainage are not factored into the calculation. This approach likely <br /> under-estimates recharge to the aquifer and, consequently, over-estimates nitrate <br /> loading. <br /> For the project Site, the local percolation and evapotranspiration rates are presented in <br /> Plates 15 and 16. The Site is located between the CIMIS Stations at Holt (station 248) <br /> and Staten Island (station 242); taking both stations into account will yield a value more <br /> representative of the Morada area. During the past five-year period, data from the Holt <br /> station were only available for 2017 and 2018; based on the calculation shown, the <br /> estimated rate of recharge from percolating waters for the Holt station is determined to <br /> be 3.72 inches (Plate 15). A statistical error of 25 percent is associated with this value. <br /> Data for the Staten Island station were available for the past three years; based on the <br /> LOGE 1919 Page 9 <br />