My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0080841 SSCRPT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
31600
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0080841 SSCRPT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2019 3:33:27 PM
Creation date
11/8/2019 3:29:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSCRPT
RECORD_ID
SR0080841
PE
2603
STREET_NUMBER
31600
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95304
APN
25515028
ENTERED_DATE
7/2/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
31600 S KOSTER RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
U N\ SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ...... <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> N'. l 1868 East Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202-3029 <br /> . a Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)468-0333 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> �<<FORN <br /> SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION REPORT REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: PA#: /Q/47� <br /> REPORT DATE: <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-905, Section 9-905.12 <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> [Zr ❑ 1.1 Description of site(report must address all parcels), including current and/or proposed zoning information. <br /> ❑' ❑ 1.2 Description of proposed development. P,�—Z <br /> [✓] F-11.3 Parcel location map. �� 3� ,9�i�,r Ne ,9 <br /> [� ❑ 1.4 Site map showing location of all items on parcel. (Examples: structures, drives,wells, septic systems, large trees, <br /> pastures, pools, natural drainage courses, ponds,waterways, etc.) <br /> 2.0 PAST, PRESENT AND PROPOSED FUTURE USES OF THE SITE SECTION <br /> 7' ❑ 2.1 Discussion of past, present and proposed future uses at the site to assess potential problems. (Example sources <br /> of information: current and/or previous property owners, historical maps, insurance maps, previous land use <br /> applications, etc.) <br /> 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF ALL PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION <br /> FJ ❑ 3.1 Discussions of the methods used to research and investigate the potential or known above and belowground <br /> sources of contamination at the project site. (Examples: Database search, EHD records search, agricultural. <br /> chemical application search-site reconnaissance and survey, etc.)p�j <br /> F1 ❑ 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> at the project site. (Examples: Agricultural chemical handling/storage/use, aboveground/underground tanks, <br /> septic systems, injection wells, un ealed wells, ponds/lagoons, vehicle/machine repair/painting, buried or <br /> stockpiled solid waste, etc.) 17 - `/,lva-f-/ mss-Jr -/"'!/,` r s`-/he s/;-ii,..f ,:'�`��..'-11 <br /> i <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified at the project site (see examples above). <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> in the area of the project site that has or may impact the project site. (Examples: Close proximity to a former <br /> landfill/former,gasoline,station, in area of known DBCP/Nitrate groundwater impact, etc.) <br /> ❑ 3.5 Description of all current off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified in the area of the project site. <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION IDENTIFIED <br /> AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> F-11 ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified (in the above section)for any real <br /> and/or potential threat to human health and the environment. This evaluation should take into consideration the <br /> proposed future uses of the project parcel. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ✓f ❑ 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each source as a real or potential threat or to recommend <br /> further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats identified. Recommendations may include <br /> additional site assessment(i.e. collection of soil/water samples) and/or mitigative measures (i.e., clean up of <br /> surface wastes). All recommendations for future work must include a time frame for implementation. <br /> ❑r' ❑ 5.2 The report was inclusive(i.e. all information referenced was included in this report-report should not reference <br /> other reports). <br /> D ❑ 5.3 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> 0 ❑ 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application. <br /> M ❑ 5.5 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report. <br /> Reviewed By:__J�_X s-grP-� )/11 t � Reviewed Date: <br /> 8�G•�9 <br /> EHD 26-01 Page 1 of 2 surface&sub Checklist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.