My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
40
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518875
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2019 4:04:13 PM
Creation date
11/12/2019 3:19:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518875
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0014182
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER BUSY BEE CLEANERS
STREET_NUMBER
40
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
LODI
Zip
95240
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
40 N MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e , <br /> 4*100 <br /> JE <br /> paa 1�: <br /> (916) 323-3372 } CP -9 <br /> Cal/EPA <br /> September 6, 1996 Pete Wilson <br /> Department of Governor <br /> Toxic Substances <br /> Control James M. Strock <br /> Ms . Stephen G. Muir Secretary for <br /> 400 P Street, WZI Incorporated Environmental <br /> 4th Floor 4700 Stockdale Highway, Suite 120 Protection <br /> P.O. Box 806 Bakersfield, California 93309 <br /> Sacramento, CA <br /> 95812-0806 RE: DISAPPROVAL OF THE AUGUST 9, 1996 PROPOSED <br /> PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR THE BUSY BEE, GUILD AND <br /> LUSTRE-CAL SITES <br /> Dear Mr. Muir: <br /> The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DISC) <br /> has reviewed your August 9, 1996 proposed performance <br /> goals for soil vapor extraction systems . Upon review <br /> and evaluation of the proposed report, DTSC disapproves <br /> the revised performance goals . <br /> RATIONALES <br /> DTSC' s disapproval of the revised performance <br /> goals is based on: (1) the proposed performance goals <br /> have not incorporated DTSC' s comments made on April 4 <br /> and June 5 , 1996 ; and (2) they are not consistent with <br /> items previously approved by DTSC. Examples of DTSC' s <br /> comments are provided below: <br /> 1 . Monitoring Frequency for the Extraction and <br /> Monitoring Wells : <br /> The proposed monitoring frequency has been <br /> inconsistent . In the first draft proposal dated <br /> December 15 , 1995, it stated that "monitoring data . . . <br /> will be collected weekly or as determined by the pilot <br /> SVE tests" . DTSC commented in the April 4 , 1996 letter <br /> that monitoring data shall be collected on a weekly <br /> bases or more frequently throughout the full scale <br /> operation. <br /> However, in the May 6, 1996 proposal, the <br /> consultants changed the proposed monitoring frequency <br /> to "weekly to biweekly depending upon site - specific <br /> SVE system evaluation and response . " In this August <br /> proposal, the consultant proposed "the monitoring <br /> frequency will be weekly to monthly. . " (Page 5 , Section <br /> 4 . 2) . <br /> 1� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.