My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
40
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518875
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2019 4:04:13 PM
Creation date
11/12/2019 3:19:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518875
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0014182
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER BUSY BEE CLEANERS
STREET_NUMBER
40
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
LODI
Zip
95240
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
40 N MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Joseph Salazar, Jr <br /> Former Busy Bee Cleaners -2 - August 20, 2003 <br /> RDFS Work Plan <br /> In sum,Busy Bee proposes to install 3 dual completion SVE wells, 2 dual completion sve/ozone <br /> sparging wells, 4 ozone sparging wells, 4 additional groundwater monitoring wells, 1900 feet of buried <br /> pipeline, vapor and liquid phase carbon treatment systems, and ozone generation equipment. <br /> Comments on the Work Plan <br /> The document proposes a substantial amount of work that should serve to greatly increase the definition <br /> of the conditions at the site such that Busy Bee will be much closer to being able to select and implement <br /> an appropriate remedy for the site. Based on the results of the proposed work,particularly the analytical <br /> results of samples taken from the proposed new monitoring wells, the possibility remains that additional <br /> characterization efforts may be needed. However,the work proposed represents the logical next steps <br /> towards remediation of the site. <br /> There are some identified deficiencies associated with the work plan itself that will need to be corrected <br /> prior to our concurrence with the work plan. In general, those deficiencies are as follows: <br /> 1. The Health and Safety Plan(HSP)presented in the report was prepared in support of the Phase 1 <br /> and Phase 2 Site Investigations. The proposed work involves many construction-related <br /> activities that were not contemplated in those investigations. The HSP needs to be updated to <br /> address health and safety concerns regarding the trenching, treatment plant construction and <br /> operation, and ozone generation activities. <br /> 2. Section 2.6 ("Preliminary Remedial Goals, Soil Screening Levels,Risk-Based Screening Levels <br /> and MCL") contains information related to some of the published values for threshold PCE <br /> contamination levels of concern for various media and exposure pathways. We recommend <br /> deletion of section 2.6 and instead, Busy Bee should include a section in the Feasibility Study <br /> that develops site-specific vadose zone remediation goals based on 1)human health risk and 2) <br /> threat to groundwater quality. Vadose zone remediation levels will be the lower of these two <br /> remediation goals. <br /> An analysis of threat to groundwater quality(a"water quality site assessment"or WQSA) is <br /> performed by modeling the impact to groundwater caused by the residual levels of contaminants <br /> in the vadose zone. Soil moisture that which enters the groundwater(recharge water or leachate) <br /> must meet groundwater cleanup levels. Groundwater cleanup levels will be based upon the <br /> Regional Board's Central Valley Basin Plan that requires, as a point-of-departure, cleanup to <br /> background levels (i.e., non-detect for PCE). Cleanup levels may be above background based <br /> upon a technical and economic feasibility analysis but in no case can cleanup levels exceed <br /> maximum beneficial use levels. <br /> Health-based cleanup levels for PCE are established by calculating the residual levels that do not <br /> pose an unacceptable residual human health risk, including an analysis of the potential health <br /> risks associated with indoor air. Indoor air risks are estimated using the Johnson and Ettinger Q <br /> &E)model. Busy Bee needs to become familiar with the J&E model and include in its RI work <br /> plan the activities necessary to obtain the data required to input to the model. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.