Laserfiche WebLink
2,44) AMINE. Common name: 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Half-lives in th74�809-environment: Air: 1.8-18 hrs. Surface water: 48-96 h. Groundwat <br /> 4320 h. Soil: selected field half-life of 4.0 d. Phytolysis half-life of 2-4 d. <br /> Fertilizers are applied through drip irrigation fertigation techniques, with the proper controls for <br /> backflow prevention. Fertigation allows for an equal distribution of nitrogen, phosphorous and <br /> potassium(NPK) for almond tree uptake,thus preventing excessive leaching past the root zone. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> From visual observations,there is no surface contamination. The probability of subsurface <br /> contamination from pesticides can be considered low-to-nonexistent, considering the <br /> environmental fate data and soil type. The soil type is predominately a silty sand and the <br /> biological activity would be lower than a clay soil, but the aerobic environment of the sandy soil <br /> would promote degradation and decomposition of organic agrichemicals. Groundwater testing <br /> for nitrate and DBCP have been performed to complete the requirements of the Soil Suitability <br /> Study. The nitrate concentration in the domestic well is a comparatively high 41 ppm; however, <br /> considering the length of time the well has been in service and the sandy nature of the soil,this <br /> nitrate concentration would be expected. Both pesticides DBCP and EDB were non-detect. <br /> Therefore, at this point in time, no corrective action is required within the boundaries of the <br /> subject property. <br /> We do not recommend the well water be tested for a multi-residue pesticide screen consisting of <br /> analysis for Dinitroanaline, Triazine, Organochlorine and Organophosphates. The subject <br /> property is outside of delineated areas in which all new wells must have a grout seal to 200 feet. <br /> Bottled water should be consumed at the subject residence,particularly if infants will be in the <br /> home. <br /> It is our opinion that contamination originating from the existing septic tank and leachfield is <br /> highly unlikely since they can be considered cross gradient to the groundwater directional flow. <br /> Contamination from a tank is usually dependent upon the age and type of tank construction <br /> material. The next time the tank is pumped out,the sewage contractor can check its integrity. <br /> The density of septic systems in the surrounding area can also be considered low. The number of <br /> systems is one of the prime factors for contamination of the underlying groundwater. <br /> Asbestos containing materials (ACM) testing from any portion of the existing buildings is outside <br /> the scope of this investigation. If the existing buildings are ever demolished, testing for ACMs <br /> should be done at that time. <br /> Naffq Ag?research <br />