Laserfiche WebLink
Response to Written Comments -12- 24 April 2007 <br /> City of Tracy WWTP <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> the US EPA recommends the use of a maximum daily effluent limitation in lieu of <br /> average weekly effluent limitations for two reasons. "First, the basis for the 7-day <br /> average for POTWs derives from the secondary treatment requirements. This <br /> basis is not related to the need for assuring achievement of water quality <br /> standards. Second, a 7-day average, which could comprise up to seven or more <br /> daily samples, could average out peak toxic concentrations and therefore the <br /> discharge's potential for causing acute toxic effects would be missed." (TSD, pg. <br /> 96) The proposed Order utilizes maximum daily effluent limitations in lieu of <br /> average weekly effluent limitations for ammonia as recommended by the TSD for <br /> the achievement of water quality standards and for the protection of the <br /> beneficial uses of the receiving stream. Additionally, mass-based effluent <br /> limitations have been included for ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite because they are <br /> oxygen-demanding substances and the receiving water is impaired for dissolved <br /> oxygen deficiencies. <br /> CITY OF TRACY - NPDES COMMENT #19: Section IV.A.2.b., IV.3.b., and IVA.b. <br /> Flow Restrictions. The City suggests that the there is no justification for flow <br /> requirements and that they be removed or set as an average over three consecutive dry <br /> weather months each year. Further, the City is concerned that its current discharge flow <br /> limit of 9 mgd (ADWF) might be exceeded before 2008. <br /> Request: Revise IV.A.2.b. to read: "The Average Dry Weather Discharge Flow shall <br /> not exceed 9.0 million gallons per day. The average dry weather flow shall be <br /> determined over three consecutive dry weather months each year" <br /> RESPONSE: It is appropriate to limit the flow of the discharge and also include <br /> mass limitations. Additional language is proposed to be added to the Order as a <br /> late revision to clarify how compliance with the flow limit will be determined (see <br /> response to CITY OF TRACY — NPDES COMMENT #27. <br /> CITY OF TRACY - NPDES COMMENT #20: Section IV.A.2.d. Mercury Mass Limits. <br /> The City questions the determination of reasonable potential for mercury and contends <br /> that this action is more stringent than required by federal law and that an analysis under <br /> Water Code section 13263 must be performed. <br /> The City also requests that if the mercury mass limit is maintained, that it be changed <br /> back to the previously suggested performance-based annual mass limit of 0.51 pounds <br /> per year to better reflect the long term concerns with mercury mass loadings and to <br /> provide a bit more regulatory flexibility. <br /> Request: Replace the proposed monthly limit with the previously suggested annual <br /> mass limit of 0.51 pounds per year because the monthly limit is impracticable, <br /> or remove the mass limit in Provision W.A.2.d. because compliance is <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region <br /> Board Meeting —3/4 May 2007 <br /> Item#17 <br />