Laserfiche WebLink
Response to Written Comments -35- 24 April 2007 <br /> City of Tracy WWTP <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY (LEPRINO) <br /> LEPRINO —WDR COMMENT #1: The number and substance of the requested <br /> changes is minimal, and primarily addresses the universal use of the term Discharger to <br /> include both the City of Tracy and Leprino Foods Company. Leprino understands that <br /> because it operates pretreatment facilities that the Board feels pose a threat to <br /> groundwater, Leprino is named as a Discharger. However, there are sections in the <br /> WDRs that refer to activities prior to Leprino utilizing Pond 2 as well as sections that <br /> refer to other City of Tracy treatment processes or studies that Leprino has no impact <br /> on or was not part of. You will see that in our proposed changes, Leprino has attempted <br /> to clarify this in those sections where it feels it should not be universally included as a <br /> named Discharger. <br /> RESPONSE: Leprino's requests are reasonable and the suggested <br /> modifications have been made in the agenda version of the tentative Order. <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region <br /> Board Meeting —3/4 May 2007 <br /> Item#17 <br />