My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HOLLY
>
3900
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505422
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2019 1:40:39 PM
Creation date
11/15/2019 1:28:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
CASE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0505422
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0006902
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY WASTEWATER TX PLNT
STREET_NUMBER
3900
STREET_NAME
HOLLY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3900 HOLLY DR
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INFORMATION SHEET 5 <br /> ORDER NO R5-2007- <br /> CITY OF TRACY AND LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY <br /> LAND DISCHARGE UNITS OF THE TRACY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> In 1991, Regional Water Board staff ordered the Discharger to conduct additional <br /> quarterly groundwater monitoring. This monitoring included the collection of samples <br /> from the ponds and monitoring wells, with analyses performed for TDS, pH, EC, and <br /> chlorides. The monitoring began in March 1992 and included six quarterly sets of <br /> data collected by the Discharger. The monitoring data appeared to confirm the <br /> holding ponds were not negatively affecting the water quality of the shallow <br /> groundwater. However, some data was contradictory. Continued concerns about <br /> potential degradation of groundwater remained and Regional Water Board staff <br /> ordered installation of a new background monitoring well, further upgradient from the <br /> ponds, due to concerns that the background monitoring well, MW-1, was not outside <br /> the influence of the ponds. The Discharger was also ordered to conduct additional <br /> groundwater monitoring, and surface water monitoring in Sugar Cut Slough, which is <br /> adjacent to the ponds. <br /> The City installed a new background well, MW-5, further upgradient from the holding <br /> ponds. Water quality sampling of the holding ponds, monitoring wells, Sugar Cut <br /> Slough, and an agricultural drainage ditch upstream of Sugar Cut Slough was <br /> conducted in September and November 1994 and March 1995. The samples were <br /> analyzed for TDS, EC, chlorides, and pH. The samples collected in November were <br /> also analyzed for major cations and anions. <br /> The data was analyzed and summarized in a 1995 report submitted by the <br /> Discharger. The 1995 Report concluded the unlined ponds percolated to the shallow <br /> groundwater, and that the shallow groundwater in the vicinity of the ponds was in <br /> hydraulic continuity with Sugar Cut Slough. Even though downgradient well samples <br /> showed higher salinity concentrations than background well samples, the 1995 <br /> Report concluded there was not adequate evidence that the ponds were causing the <br /> increases, because the underlying groundwater had higher concentrations than the <br /> ponds. The 1995 Report further concluded the ponds were not adversely affecting <br /> surface water in Sugar Cut Slough. <br /> The monitoring and reporting program contained in Order No. 96-104 required <br /> quarterly monitoring of the holding ponds and groundwater for TDS and EC. Based <br /> on monitoring from October 1999 through May 2004, it is evident the EC of the ponds <br /> has increased from the levels measured in 1994 and 1995, which were used to <br /> evaluate groundwater degradation caused by the ponds. Prior to 1997, Heinz Foods, <br /> Inc. discharged approximately 1.6 to 2.0 mgd of tomato wastewater to the ponds <br /> during the summer months. Since Heinz ceased its discharge to the Facility, the <br /> average EC concentrations of the ponds have increased. This may be due to lower <br /> flows through the ponds. Leprino discharges on average about 0.6 mgd. Lower flows <br /> result in longer detention times and increased evaporation may be causing the <br /> increase in EC in the ponds. This is corroborated by pond monitoring data from 2001 <br /> — 2004, which show increases in EC from March-October each year. Downgradient <br /> groundwater sampling shows that groundwater quality fluctuates with EC peaking in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.