My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HOLLY
>
3900
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505422
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2019 1:40:39 PM
Creation date
11/15/2019 1:28:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
CASE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0505422
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0006902
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY WASTEWATER TX PLNT
STREET_NUMBER
3900
STREET_NAME
HOLLY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3900 HOLLY DR
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL Lb�KLITY ORDER NO. R5-2005-0143 �.rr -2- <br /> CITY OF TRACY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> National Ambient Water Quality Criteria for chlorine residual to prevent acute(lethal) <br /> effects to aquatic life is 0.019 mg/L, on a 1-hour average. The effluent had a concentration <br /> more than three hundred fifty (350)times the acute criterion. The discharge would have <br /> caused the receiving water to greatly exceed the acute criterion at the outfall, and <br /> potentially for a considerable distance downstream, because given the concentration of the <br /> effluent, it could not have mixed with the receiving water quickly enough to be diluted <br /> below the acute criterion. <br /> 7. The Discharger violated Standard Provision A.17 of Order No. 96-104, which states: <br /> "The discharger shall take all reasonable steps to minimize any adverse effects to waters of <br /> the State or users of those waters resulting from any discharge or sludge use or disposal in <br /> violation of this Order. Reasonable steps shall include such accelerated or additional <br /> monitoring as necessary to determine the nature and impact of the noncomplying discharge <br /> or sludge use or disposal." <br /> The Discharger failed to properly document the nature and impact of the chlorine release by <br /> not acting immediately after discovery of the release. <br /> a) The Discharger waited 13 hours after the release to visually inspect the receiving water; <br /> b) The Discharger waited 19 hours after the release to collect in-stream samples for total <br /> chlorine residual. <br /> 8. The discharge violated Provision F.1 and Standard Provision A.22 of Order No. 96-104, <br /> which require that neither the discharge nor its treatment shall create a nuisance or <br /> pollution as defined in CWC section 13050. The discharge of highly chlorinated effluent at <br /> levels that exceed the effluent limitations constitutes pollution. <br /> 9. CWC section 13385 states, in part: <br /> "(a) Any person who violates any of the following shall be liable civilly in accordance with <br /> this section: <br /> (1) Section 13375 or 13376. <br /> (2)Any waste discharge requirements...issued pursuant to this chapter..." <br /> "(5)Any requirements of Section 301, 302, 306, 307,308, 318,401, or 405 of the <br /> Clean Water Act, as amended". <br /> "(c) Civil liability may be imposed administratively by the state board or a regional board <br /> pursuant to Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 13323)of Chapter 5 in an amount not to <br /> exceed the sum of both of the following: . <br /> (1) Ten thousand dollars($10,000) for each day in which the violation occurs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.