My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HOLLY
>
3900
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505422
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2019 1:40:39 PM
Creation date
11/15/2019 1:28:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
CASE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0505422
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0006902
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY WASTEWATER TX PLNT
STREET_NUMBER
3900
STREET_NAME
HOLLY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3900 HOLLY DR
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY ORDER NO.R5-2005-0143 �.I -4- <br /> CITY OF TRACY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> failing to adequately assess the impacts to the receiving water and failing to properly notify <br /> state and local officials. <br /> Due to the remote location of the outfall and the time of the release being at night, it may <br /> have been difficult and possibly dangerous for the Discharger to immediately assess the <br /> effect of the chlorine release on the local biota. But, a more thorough inspection was <br /> warranted and required. The Discharger visually inspected the receiving water by boat at <br /> 0930 hours the following day and conducted routine monitoring, collecting water quality <br /> samples for temperature, dissolved oxygen,pH, turbidity, and conductivity. However, they <br /> failed to evaluate the samples for chlorine residual. The Discharger waited until 1319 <br /> hours to report the violation to the Regional Board. Regional Board staff ordered the <br /> Discharger to collect water quality samples for chlorine residual and also ordered it to <br /> notify the State Office of Emergency Services (OES). The Discharger notified OES at <br /> 1504 hours and collected samples for chlorine residual at 1545 hours. The Discharger's <br /> lack of urgency surrounding the highly toxic release of chlorine illustrates that its standard <br /> operating procedures and emergency/contingency plans were deficient. <br /> Gravity: The receiving water is significantly impaired. Old River and the Sacramento-San <br /> Joaquin Delta are listed as impaired under section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act <br /> and identified as "Toxic Hot Spots,"pursuant to the Bay Protection and Toxic Hot Spot <br /> Cleanup Program. The large release of chlorine, at levels that would be acutely toxic to <br /> aquatic life, is likely to have caused significant adverse impacts on the receiving water. <br /> Toxicity/Extent: Chlorine is acutely toxic to aquatic life. The USEPA National Ambient <br /> Water Quality Criteria to prevent acute (lethal)effects from chlorine is 0.019 mg/L, on a <br /> 1-hour average. The effluent had a concentration more than three hundred fifty (350)times <br /> the acute criterion, and was discharged for approximately 95 minutes. The discharge <br /> caused the receiving water to greatly exceed the acute criterion at the outfall, and <br /> potentially a considerable distance downstream, because given the concentration of the <br /> effluent, it could not have mixed with the receiving water quickly enough to be diluted <br /> below the acute criterion. <br /> Susceptibility of the discharge to cleanup/Voluntary cleanup efforts: The effect of highly <br /> chlorinated effluent on the receiving water is predominantly acute toxicity to aquatic <br /> organisms. This type of discharge is not susceptible to clean up by the Discharger, however <br /> it could have been prevented or minimized with proper operation of the facility. <br /> Degree of culpability: The release of chlorinated effluent was an accidental release. The <br /> on-duty operator immediately corrected the problem after discovery of the malfunctioning <br /> SO2 feed system. However,the Discharger is culpable for not having adequate controls or <br /> redundancy to minimize or avoid chlorine releases. Furthermore,the Discharger is <br /> culpable for not adequately training wastewater operators to properly respond to failures of <br /> this nature, and for not maintaining sufficient preventive plans and emergency response <br /> procedures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.