Laserfiche WebLink
Soil Suitability 1 Nitrate Loading Study Irerracon <br /> Betschart Property Lodi, CA <br /> July 19, 2019 Terracon Project No. NA197044 <br /> convenient and simplified method to estimate long-term groundwater nitrate impacts on an area- <br /> wide basis. <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore found that over a long period of time, water quality in the upper <br /> saturated groundwater zone closely approximates the quality of percolating recharge waters. <br /> They believe that their method is a good planning tool and provides useful information to planners <br /> and local officials but with some real limitations. In their article published in Ground Water, <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore mention that "...the equation ignores dispersion, lateral flow, and <br /> mixing with groundwater flow from up-gradient areas. These processes would generally <br /> contribute to additional reduction of nitrate-nitrogen concentrations in groundwater to the extent <br /> that the nitrate-nitrogen concentration of groundwater flow from up-gradient areas is lower." <br /> The Hantzsche and Finnemore approach is "...a conservative (worst case) first approximation of <br /> groundwater nitrate-nitrogen concentration resulting from the combined effect of on-site sewage <br /> disposal systems and precipitation. This (the equation and approach) is for estimation of long- <br /> term effect (i.e., over years)on groundwater quality, and is not intended for prediction of seasonal <br /> changes" (Hantzsche and Finnemore, 1992). <br /> The method takes into account the development area, soil denitrification factor, rainfall volume, <br /> rainfall nitrate concentration, waste effluent quantity, and waste effluent nitrate concentration. The <br /> formula, assumptions and calculations used for the analysis are shown in Appendix F. The units <br /> of nitrate used in the mass balance equation are nitrate-N, whose maximum drinking water <br /> contaminant level (MCL) is 10 mg/L. <br /> 2.1 Chemical and Physical Properties of Soil <br /> 2.1.1 Chemical and Physical Soil Properties <br /> Terracon reviewed the USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey and USDA Soil Survey of San Joaquin <br /> County (1992)for information regarding San Joaquin loam soils (Section 1.5). Selected physical <br /> and chemical properties for the soil types are listed in the following table. <br /> Table B. <br /> Physical and Chemical Properties* <br /> Soil <br /> Name/ Depth USDA Unified Soil Clay Permeability Soil Salinity Septic tank <br /> M Map (in) Texture Classification (/o) (in/hour) absorption <br /> (PH)reaction (mmhos/cm) fields <br /> Symbol <br /> Fine <br /> 0-5 sandy SM 10-14 2.0-6.0 5.6-7.3 <2 <br /> Kingdon loam <br /> fine Fine <br /> 5-14 sandy SM 10-14 2.0-6.0 6.1-7.3 <2 Moderate, <br /> sandy loam wetness, <br /> loam/ peres slowly <br /> 189 Sandy <br /> 14-28 loam,fine SM 10-14 2.0-6.0 6.1-7.3 <2 <br /> sandy <br /> loam <br /> Responsive a Resourceful s Reliable 12 <br />