My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0080649 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ACAMPO
>
10351
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0080649 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2019 2:29:31 PM
Creation date
11/18/2019 1:55:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0080649
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
BRETT LAGORIO
STREET_NUMBER
10351
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ACAMPO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
Zip
95220
APN
01718010
ENTERED_DATE
5/22/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
10351 E ACAMPO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.7 Discussion of any potential problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or <br /> alternative septic system. In this area, the soils are classified as Acampo Sandy Loam, Bruella <br /> Sandy Loam and Tokay Fine Sandy Loam. Due to this classification and percolation rate, a <br /> standard septic system would be recommended on subject parcel. <br /> 6.8 Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future leach <br /> fields needed at the site. Based on the results of the percolation rate and the soils profile, it is <br /> Dillon&Murphy's opinion that the subject proposed parcels are suited for a typical on-site sewage <br /> disposal system. The systems should be properly designed and installed according to the current <br /> San Joaquin County criteria for standard septic systems. <br /> Based on the depth to groundwater in the area,and the size of the proposed parcels,it is our opinion <br /> on that the installation of any new proposed septic system, if property installed, should not <br /> adversely affect the quality of groundwater in the area. <br /> 7.0 CONCLUSION SECTION <br /> The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the proposed <br /> development,the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they existed at the time we <br /> excavated our test hole and performed the percolation test. It was assumed that the test holes and <br /> percolation test results are representative of the subsurface conditions in the general area. <br /> The Conditions of Approval for PA-1800170 required a Nitrate Loading Study. I spoke to Linda <br /> Turkette and explained the uniqueness of this project. The owner actually already owns two legal <br /> parcels. One parcel (APN 017-260-17) is twenty acres and the other parcel (APN 017-180-10) is <br /> approximately 75 acres. The owner's intent was to create two equal sized parcels via a Lot Line <br /> Adjustment application. The owner was not allowed to submit a Lot Line Adjustment application <br /> due to a technicality. (The properties were contiguous at a point rather than a line). If the goal <br /> could have been met via a Lot Line Adjustment, neither a Soils Suitability Report or a Nitrate <br /> Loading Study would have been required. Due to the technicality,the properties had to be merged <br /> and then divided via this Minor Subdivision application. <br /> I explained this to Linda Turkette and she indicated that a general discussion of the impact to the <br /> groundwater would suffice rather than an actual Nitrate Loading Study. Obviously, one homesite <br /> every 47 acres has very minimal impact to the groundwater. The depth to groundwater (180"'-) <br /> and the soil classification yielding a permeability rate of"moderately slow" are all indicators that <br /> the reconfiguration of the two large acreage parcels will have negligible impact to the groundwater. <br /> Our services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions proposed in accordance <br /> with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. The warranty is in lieu of all other <br /> warranties either expressed or implied. Test findings and statements of professional opinion do <br /> not constitute at or warranty, expressed or implied. <br /> Q�,pFESS/pN <br /> t.�►URPyy <br /> r*i <br /> LU <br /> 0 5277 J e urphy <br /> EXP 9-30- + E. 45277 <br /> sTgT �I'ki 1 V 4 <br /> F OF C P��F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.