Laserfiche WebLink
Potentially . Less Than Less Than Analyzed <br /> Significant Sgnificant with Significant No In The <br /> 9 Mitigation 9 <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Prior EIR <br /> 'll. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial <br /> adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or 1:1 a 1:1 1:1death involving: <br /> El i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as <br /> delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo <br /> Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the <br /> State Geologist for the area or based on other ❑ ❑ X 1:1substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to <br /> Division of Mines and Geology Special <br /> Publication 42. <br /> ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ <br /> iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ❑ ❑ � —1liquefaction? <br /> iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑X <br /> b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of <br /> topsoil? F-1 X❑ F-1 ❑ <br /> �) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, <br /> or that would become unstable as a result of the <br /> project, and potentially result in on- or off-site El ElEl Ellandslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction <br /> or collapse? <br /> d) Be located on expansive soil and create direct or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> indirect risks to life or property? <br /> e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the <br /> use of septic tanks or alternative waste water ❑ � a ❑ <br /> disposal systems where sewers are not available for <br /> the disposal of waste water? <br /> f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique <br /> paleontological resource or site or unique geologic ❑ <br /> feature? 11 X 11 <br /> Impact Discussion: <br /> The Soil Survey of San Joaquin County classifies the soil on the parcel as Bruella sandy loam, hard substratum, 0 to 2 <br /> percent slopes; Exeter sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes; Hicksville loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded, <br /> San Joaquin loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded; San Joaquin loam, thick surface, 0 to 2 percent slopes; and San <br /> Joaquin complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes. <br /> Bruella sandy loam's permeability is moderately slow and water capacity is moderate. This unit is suited to homesite <br /> ievelopment. Bruella sandy loam has a storie index rating of 60 and a land capability of IIs irrigated and IVs nonirrigated. <br /> Exeter sandy loam's permeability is moderate and water capacity is low. This unit is suited to irrigated row, field, and <br /> vineyard crops. Exeter sandy loam has a storie index rating of 32 and a land capability of Ills irrigated and IVs <br /> PA-1900129 (UP)—Initial Study 13 <br />