My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0080264 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DIABLO
>
16327
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0080264 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:10:17 AM
Creation date
11/19/2019 9:39:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0080264
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
16327
STREET_NAME
DIABLO
STREET_TYPE
CT
City
TRACY
Zip
95304
APN
20937019
ENTERED_DATE
2/27/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
16327 DIABLO CT
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
267
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
oPqV l" SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 2 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> N 1868 East Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202-3029 <br /> c• ^.P Telephone: (209)468-3420 Fax:(209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> 9�/FORS <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> �" <br /> SITE LOCATION: I�p�jZ1 �I�a1�10 (xo,('r PA#: <br /> REPORT DATE: <br /> = Sufficient <br /> 1 = Insufficient <br /> San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> I <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> 1' 11 <br /> ® ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with Tespect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> ® ❑ 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> stil,'o l-y•1 Ko —Go' <br /> ® ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. tzd 3 ID9)Up14•,. <br /> ® ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. - <br /> N o dr�w�,M,l at,� c1 K <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ® ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ne.w� by *,04r 4-A-r P'Y"�3 <br /> ® F-13.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> P-Y-"3 <br /> ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitFate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load rom <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. <br /> g ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ® ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> [jd ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or anv other constituent of concern, at and/or around the project site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> © ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> [ ] ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: P* 5k-f iw^- r414`" ) Reviewed Date: <br /> EHD 26-02 Page 1 of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.