Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 RESULTS <br /> 4.1 Depth to Groundwater and Hydraulic Gradient <br /> The depth to groundwater on June 14 was between 35 and 36 feet, which is two feet less than the <br /> depth in January 2005 (Table 1) The calculated elevation of the water table is approximately 20 <br /> feet below sea level <br /> Figure 3 illustrates the hydraulic gradient and general direction of groundwater flow As in <br /> previous quarters, the contours indicate that the piezometric surface slopes eastward and is <br /> steeper beneath Grant Street (west of the site)than beneath the site itself <br /> 4.2 Analytical Results <br /> Hydrocarbon concentrations in June were somewhat lower than those measured in January in <br /> most wells (Table 2) In VM-1, the TPH-g concentration was roughly 54% of the January <br /> concentration In VM-4, VM-6, and VM-7, this concentration declined by more than 50% In <br /> VM-2, all analytes were detected at approximately 80% of their January concentrations <br /> 5.0 REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES <br /> A vapor extraction line was installed near the end of the first quarter of 2005 A concrete saw <br /> was used to remove the concrete and dig a 1-foot wide trench from the vapor extraction unit to <br /> the extraction well (VT-1) Schedule 40 PVC pipe was lard in the trench and temporarily covered <br /> with gravel The trench will be paved over with corierete alter the vapor extraction system has <br /> been tested and inspected by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District <br /> The only other remedial activity that was performed since the First Quarter 2005 Report was <br /> prepared was the submission of an application to install a temporary propane gas tank at the site <br /> to supply supplemental fuel to the vapor extraction unit The application was prepared in late <br /> April-early May, but the tank has not yet been mobilized <br /> � I <br /> • 3 <br />