Laserfiche WebLink
4.2 Groundwater Gradient <br /> Figure 3 illustrates the general direction of groundwater flow Presently, flow is to the ea3t The <br /> gradient is essentially unchanged since October It decreases from 0 004 ft/ft in the nortlt,.m part <br /> of the site to 0 0025 ft/ft in the %outhem part of the site The steeper gradient near VM-4 is <br /> probably due to the low-permeability clay that is present in the northern part of the site 7 his clay <br /> may confine groundwater to a slightly deeper depth by restricting flow from the west <br /> 4.3 Analytical Results <br /> In monitor wells VM-1 and VM-2, gasoline and BTEX concentrations generally increas:d over <br /> their concentrations in February and returned to the ranges that were seen in most previous <br /> sampling events (Table 2) Concentrations in VM-3 remain generally below detection it hits, but <br /> the gasoline concentration in VM-4 increased to its highest level since that well was drilled <br /> BTEX concentrations in VM-4 also increased, but to a lesser extent As in most of the previous <br /> monitoring events, this is the only well in which MTBE was detected (Table 3) None o -the <br /> other oxygenates were detected in any of the wells <br /> 4.4 Bacterial Analyses <br /> Cytoculture prepared glass plates for each sample and grew the bacterial colonies for se'Im days <br /> before conducting plate counts of bacterial populations Their report is included in Appt radix B <br /> Natural ly-occuring bacteria were present in the water samples from all four wells Meas fired in <br /> bacterial colony-forming units per milliter (CFU/ml), concentrations of non-specific <br /> heterotrophic bacteria ranged from 1 1 x 103 CFU/ml in VM-1 to 3 4 x 104 CFU/ml in N M-3 <br /> Concentrations of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria ranged from below the reliable quant ti tation <br /> limit of 1 0 x 101 CFIJ/ml in VM-4 to 2 0 x 104 CFU/ml in VM-3 <br /> These results are interesting, and indicate that populations from VM-1 and VM-2 grew butter on <br /> gasoline food sources than on non-gasoline sources This implies that bacteria in these vi,,lls, <br /> both of which are contaminated. have adapted to the gasoline food source that is present n the <br /> water in the vicinity of these wells hi contrast, very limited bacterial populations are prv,,ent in <br /> the vicinity of VM-4 Neither hydrocarbon degraders nor other heterotrophs are abundain there <br /> Heterotrophs are most abundant in VM-3, but somewhat surprisingly, hydrocarbon degraders are <br /> also abundant in the sample from this well 'Little or no hydrocarbon contamination has -)sen <br /> detected in this well in any sampling event This suggests that there may be another type 2f <br /> hydrocarbon food source in the i,icinity of this well, such as decomposing organic matter from a <br /> sewer line A sewer odor has been noted occasionally in VM-2 during purging, but not in VM-3 <br /> Another possibility is that the bacteria have adapted to feeding on remnant organic matt:, in the <br /> soil, when this well was drilled in 1996, decomposed plant material was noted in soil saniples at <br /> depths of 15 and 30 feet <br /> • 4 <br />