Laserfiche WebLink
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> • Upgradient Environmental Consultants visited the Valley Motors dealership on February 19 to <br /> measure water depths and collect groundwater samples from the four on-site monitor well 3 The <br /> depth to groundwater has risen one foot since the last monitoring in October, and measurements <br /> indicate that groundwater continues to flow to the east The data indicate that the gradient is steeper <br /> in the northern part of the site near VM-4 than in the southern part of the site near VM-3 The <br /> difference appears to be related to the permeability of the water-bearing zone hi the north low- <br /> permeability clay near the ground surface forms a slight confining layer, causing the static water <br /> surface to be slightly deeper than in the southern part of the site <br /> After measuring the depth to groundwater,the wells were purged with a submersible grou adwater <br /> pump and water samples were collected with disposable Teflon bailers, poured into 40-m1 vials and <br /> preserved for laboratory analysis The samples were analyzed for TPH-gasoline using EPA method <br /> 602, for BTEX using EPA method 8020, and for five oxygenates using EPA method 8240B After <br /> declining in October 1998, gasoline-range hydrocarbon concentrations rose sharply in VM-1, while <br /> BTEX concentrations continued to decline to their lowest levels since monitoring began in 1995 <br /> Concentrations of all analytes continued to decline in VM-2, and benzene is the only BTEX <br /> compound detected in this well The laboratory noted that the gasoline chromatograms from both <br /> wells differ from the gasoline standard, and that two non-gasoline peaks were strong contributors to <br /> the concentrations reported These peaks may represent solvent compounds, several of which have <br /> been detected in these wells in the past <br /> Samples from VM-3 and VM-4 did not contain detectable concentrations of gasoline Benzene, <br /> toluene, and xylene were detected very near the reporting limit in VM-4 None of the well, <br /> contained detectable concentrations of any of the oxygenates Previously, MTBE had been detected <br /> on once occasion in VM-1 and TBA had been reported on one occasion in VM-4 These niay have <br /> been laboratory errors (carryover from previously analyzed samples from another site) <br /> In addition to groundwater monitoring, two other issues were addressed during the first quarter On <br /> January 12, a meeting was held at the offices of the San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Division to discuss the issue of the removal of a small underground storage tank from the sidewalk <br /> along Main Street PHS/EHD requested Valley Motors to submit a tank closure permit and pay <br /> delinquent fees Valley Motors informed PHS/EHD that prior to April 1998 the existence if the <br /> tank was unknown and that because the tank is located in the public sidewalk,the City of Stockton <br /> is responsible for its removal Valley Motors was instructed to inform the City in writing, and the <br /> issue was tabled pending a response from the City <br /> Also during the first quarter, Upgradient Environmental submitted a Soil Remediation Plan to <br /> PHS/EHD for review The purpose of the SRP was to present the rationale and methodology for <br /> interim remediation of the site in the second quarter of 1999 PHS/EHD reviewed the SRF in early <br /> March Due to the volume of soil proposed for excavation, PHS/EHD concluded that the 'State UST <br /> Fund would not approve the costs associated with the proposed methodology Therefore, PHS/EHD <br /> did not approve the SRP <br />• 1 <br />