Laserfiche WebLink
6131 Pacific, Stockton <br /> 11, <br /> + 0 • Pagel of 4 <br /> Lori Duncan [EH] <br /> From: Margaret Lagorio[EH] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 3:13 PM <br /> To: Harlin Knoll [EH]; Jeff Wong [EH]; Lori Duncan [EH]; Mike Infurna [EH]; Nuel Henderson [EH]; Vicki <br /> McCartney [EH] <br /> Subject: FW: 6131 Pacific, Stockton <br /> FYI More on remediation system followup testing that we can discuss next Wednesday. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Kasey Foley [EH] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 3:01 PM <br /> To: 'denis.l.brown@shell.com' <br /> Cc: Margaret Lagorio [EH]; Raymond von Flue [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 6131 Pacific, Stockton <br /> Let me clarify your last statement first. <br /> When the LOP staff review a remediation plan and the map shows placement of remediation piping etc.being <br /> installed over or near the UST system LOP staff will require the responsible party to contact the UST Compliance <br /> staff(Environmental Health Unit III) and comply with all Unit III's testing requirements after the remediation system <br /> components have been installed. Unit III will inquire as to the specific work that occurred onsite and will make a <br /> decision at that time. <br /> My concern with this approach is if the actual work performed is different than what was submitted for review <br /> there is a possibility that some sites may be missed. Other than that, this approach should work. <br /> Regarding the testing question, I want to be sure we are using the same language. We would like the exposed <br /> vent piping tested to show it wasn't compromised. If there is any other piping that may have been impacted then <br /> it should be tested as well. There is no annual testing requirement for vent or vapor lines from an Environmental <br /> Health standpoint, there may be an APCD annual testing requirement. <br /> If the product piping was impacted (and we don't know that it was)then its secondary containment should be <br /> tested. If the secondary containment of the entire system was tested then it would not be due again for another <br /> 36 months. <br /> I hope I was able to answer your questions. <br /> ---------------------------------------------------------- <br /> Kasey L. Foley, R.E.H.S., Program Coordinator <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> 304 E. Weber Avenue <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> (209)468-3451 <br /> (209)468-3433 Fax <br /> kfoley@sjcehd.com <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: denis.l.brown@shell.com [mailto:denis.l.brown@shell.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 9:07 AM <br /> To: Kasey Foley [EH] <br /> Cc: Margaret Lagorio [EH]; Raymond von Flue [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 6131 Pacific, Stockton <br /> 12/6/2006 <br />