Laserfiche WebLink
UNION ICE COMPANY <br /> 1320 West Weber Avenue <br />' Stockton, California <br /> Quarterly Sampling Report - October, 1992 <br /> Site Code !#1283 <br /> I <br /> NARRATIVE <br /> On October 14, 1992, WHF Environmental Consultants, Inc , in conjunction with <br /> HKM, Inc , conducted field measurements along with well pumping and sampling on <br /> 10 groundwater monitoring wells located at this site. <br /> iGround water elevations were taken from ten wells prior to pumping (Table 1) Each <br /> well was evacuated by means of a steam cleaned, stainless steel bladder-type pump At <br /> least 3 well volumes were pumped from each well During the 3 volume pump down of <br />' each well, samples were collected to measure the field pH, electrical conductivity and <br /> temperature Once stability was achieved and a minimum of 3 well volumes were <br /> removed, the samples were collected with a steam cleaned, polyethylene disposable <br /> bailer The samples were then labeled and placed in an ice chest cooled with blue ice <br /> and crushed ice. <br />' The samples were then logged on a Chain of Custody and transported to Geo Monitor <br /> Laboratories, a State certified laboratory in Hesperia, California. The analysis <br />' requested for the 10 water samples was EPA method 602 for purgeable aromatic <br /> hydrocarbons (BTX&E) and method 5030/LUFT for total petroleum hydrocarbons- <br /> gasoline The analytes and concentrations detected are listed in Table 3 of this report <br />' On October 24 1992, a second set of water level measurements was taken from the <br /> Iwells <br /> The ground water elevations noted in this quarter's measurements are referenced on the <br />' groundwater chart in Tables 1&2 of this report The ground water gradient is still in <br /> the southeast direction The ground water measurement from MW-1 on 10/14/92 was <br /> not used in the calculation of gradient since it appeared to have been incorrectly <br /> recorded Also, the measurement from MW-4S on 10124192, since the water level was <br /> consistent with MW-41) and not MW-4S <br /> 1 <br />