My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012656
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
1325
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545007
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012656
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 5:31:51 PM
Creation date
12/3/2019 4:50:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012656
RECORD_ID
PR0545007
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0025604
FACILITY_NAME
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
1325
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1325 W WEBER AVE
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
914
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KLEINEELDER <br /> 1a <br /> soil samples collected and the screening results using a qualitative soil-vapor reading <br /> instrument. Since field screening did not indicate the presence of volatile hydrocarbon <br /> compounds in B-1 and B-2,the bottom samples from each of those borings were submitted <br /> for analysis. Positive readings were observed from the bottom sample from B-3 and was <br /> selected for chemical analysis. The locations of the three borings with respect to a local <br /> C benchmark are provided on Table 1. <br /> VA <br /> 3.3 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION <br /> i = On March 6 and 7, 1990, three monitoring wells were installed in accordance with the <br /> sampling work plan dated May 1, 1959. Regional ground water elevation maps indicated i <br /> y that ground water flow direction was to the northeast. The monitoring wells were installed <br /> based on regional ground water flow directions such that MW-1 would be upgradient and <br /> i � <br /> MW-3 would be downgradient of the excavation. MW-2 was installed at a location <br /> perpendicular to the assumed flow direction to provide the necessary data for calculating <br /> I-' the on-site gradient. Well construction details are shown in Table 1,and their locations are <br /> shown on Plate 3. <br /> ' Generally, clays and clay-rich silts were encountered to a depth of approximately 10 or 15 <br /> c:9 feet below land surface. Below 10 to 15 feet, the soil changed to fine grained sands and <br /> clayey sands. Water was encountered at a depth of approximately nine feet below land <br /> surface in MW-1 and MW-2. Ground water was encountered at a depth of approximately <br /> 14 feet below land surface in MW-3. Well logs are included in Appendix C. More specific <br /> protocol for installation of monitoring wells is presented in Appendix B. <br /> r ; <br /> 3.4 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT AND SAMPLING <br /> r � <br /> On March 13, 1990, the three monitoring wells were developed to set the sand pack. <br /> Development was performed using a Teflon bailer. Approximately 12 well volumes (36 <br /> .., gallons) were purged from each well during development. Well development protocol is <br /> described in Appendix B. Well development logs are shown in Appendix D. <br /> i <br /> On March 16, 1990, the three monitoring wells were purged to obtain a sample of water <br /> representative of formation water. Approximately four to five well volumes of water were <br /> purged_from the..wells using..a Tefion.bailer..prior to.the collection..of a sample. Purge logs <br /> , -----. —..--- --------- <br /> '"� are contained in Appendix D. Sampling protocol is described in Appendix B. <br /> FIs-9a-101 4 <br /> s Copyright 1990 Ceinfeider, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.