My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012656
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
1325
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545007
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012656
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 5:31:51 PM
Creation date
12/3/2019 4:50:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012656
RECORD_ID
PR0545007
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0025604
FACILITY_NAME
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
1325
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1325 W WEBER AVE
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
914
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
------------------ <br /> KLEINFELDEIL <br /> i� <br /> 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> i <br /> s Soil and ground water adjacent to the excavation was found to be affected by petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons. The lateral extent of impact appears to be limited to the area within 10 to <br /> 15 feet north,west, and south of the excavation. The area east of the excavation could not <br /> be investigated because of the presence of the warehouse,and the conditions in this area <br /> r� <br /> are not known. <br /> f opposite the regional round <br /> The groundwater gradient was found to be to the southwest, opp � g <br /> i r water gradient. A monitoring well was not installed directly downgradient from the <br /> c <br /> excavation,however,soil-gas survey samples downgradient of the excavation did not reveal <br /> the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the ground water . Analysis of ground water <br /> samples indicate that ground water does not appear to be affected by petroleum <br /> p: hydrocarbon constituents 30 feet west of the tank excavation. Ground water from NM-1 <br /> did appear to be affected by coliform,possibly due to the nearby sewer line. <br /> The low permeability of the soil, the shallow ground water gradient,and probable gradient <br /> s � <br /> fluctuations due to tides and/or seasonal variations would affect the migration of <br /> contaminants in ground water. Therefore, it is possible that ground water samples from <br /> le <br /> MW-1, a monitoring well located 30 feet west of the tank excavation, and <br /> soil <br /> excavation.gas <br /> ' locations K and F would be affected if contaminants migrated from the tank <br /> ' well southwest of the tank excavation does not appear to be necessary at this time. <br /> E.{ <br /> Kleirfelder recommends continued monitoring of the ground water quality and gradient to <br /> assess the effects of seasonal variations and to provide reproducibility of the date for <br /> statistical validity. The need for another monitoring well southwest of the excavation also <br /> should be evaluated if a sufficient level of reproducibility is reached and the initial data is <br /> validated. Meanwhile, Kleinfelder recommends that the affected soil and ground water <br /> around the excavation be remediated. Because of the shallow nature of the ground water, <br /> soil remediation options should consider options for combining the treatment of the first <br /> encountered ground water. <br /> 3 j <br /> As required, a copy of this report should be submitted to San Joaquin County Public <br /> Health Services. <br /> F15-90-101 � <br /> I Copyright 1940 Kt91nf*Ldor, Inc. <br /> I+S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.