Laserfiche WebLink
Fq_ <br /> fk <br /> i3aboratory AnalYses <br /> al <br /> The samples were transported en ironmentalhain f 1 bo atory custody to c rtified by <br /> a sin West SacramCalifornia Department of To <br /> Substances Control to the. <br /> Erseco analyzed the samples for Cou <br /> nty. <br /> Ij c samples werettested <br /> guidelines provided by San Joaquin County. <br /> for the following: <br /> • Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline and diesel; <br /> • Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes(BTE&X); <br /> Ethylene Dibromide(EDB); and <br /> Total Lead. <br /> The results of the analyses are summarized and presented in Table <br /> 4-1. Copies of the laboratory report and chain of custody are <br /> continued in Appendix J. <br /> FindhIP <br /> The tank formerly located at 1541 'Vest Weber appeared to be in good <br /> condition when it was removed. No constitue this t of co cerexcanon <br /> found in the soils surrounding thire <br /> s tank. `Thus, <br /> is considered to be closed. No water was found in the tank <br /> excavation. er showed corrosion and <br /> The tank formerly located is and ground water from the tank excavation on <br /> holes. Analyses of so <br /> te <br /> indicate the presence o <br /> f willbene and requiredtoassessp he extentlo lthe <br /> additional investigation <br /> affected soil and ground water. <br /> The presence 1of lead in soil and 541 West Weber is�co sitenttwith the lead detectedeat <br /> d waer at 1325 West ebr, <br /> o and in soil at <br /> anic lead was detected at 1515 West <br /> 1515 West s l kel Because <br /> the lead gat 1325 and 1541 West Weber also <br /> Weber, it is Yles from <br /> represents Wackgro 11 be analyzed for organund conce icbrather than tot <br /> al lad to <br /> 1325 Weeber <br /> assess whether the lead detections could be associated with the <br /> former-tan _ <br /> __.. <br /> : f <br /> 4-5 <br />