My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012656
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
1325
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545007
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012656
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 5:31:51 PM
Creation date
12/3/2019 4:50:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012656
RECORD_ID
PR0545007
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0025604
FACILITY_NAME
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
1325
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1325 W WEBER AVE
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
914
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� - A Er. sa •r: <br /> G <br /> KLEINFELDER <br /> S CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Soil and ground water adjacent to the excavation was found to be affected by petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons. The lateral extent of impact appears to be limited to the area within 10 to <br /> 15 feet north,west, and south of the excavation. The area east of the excLvation could not <br /> be investigated because of the presence of the warehouse, and the conditions in this area <br /> are not known. <br /> The ground water gradient was found to be to the southwest, opposite the regional ground <br /> water gradient. A monitoring well was not installed directly downgradient from the <br /> excavation,however,soil-gas survey samples downgradient of the excavation did not reveal <br /> the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the ground water. Analysis of ground water <br /> samples indicate that ground water does not appear to be affected by petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon constituents 30 feet west of the tank excavation.h oGrounewerd water from MW-1 <br /> did appear to be affected by coliform,possibly du <br /> The low permeability of the soil, the shallow ground water gradient,and probable gradient <br /> ides and/or seasonal variations would affect the rnigration of <br /> fluctuatiors due to t <br /> ' sible that ground water samples from <br /> contaminants in ground water. Therefore, it is pas <br /> MW-1, a monitoring well located 30 feet west of the tank excavation, and soil gas sample <br /> locations K and F would be affected if contaminants migrated from the tai k excavation. A <br /> well southwest of the tank excavation does not appear to be necessary at'his time. <br /> Kieinfelder recommends continued monitoring of-the ground water quality and gradient to <br /> assess the effects of seasonal variations andr wdie reproducibility of the excavaton also <br /> for <br /> validity. The need for another monitoring1 sou hwest of the <br /> should be evaluated if a sufficient level of reproducibility iltly i affectedsoil and groundane initial dwater <br /> ata is <br /> validated. Meanwhile, Kleinfeider recommends that <br /> around the excavation be remediated. Because of forcombiningoshallow nature <br /> the treatmethe ntoof he first <br /> soil remediation options should consider options <br /> T encountered groundwater. <br /> As required, a copy of this report should be submitted to San Joaquin County Public <br /> Health Services. <br /> S <br /> F15-90-101 <br /> Copyright 1990 Kteinfelder, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.