Laserfiche WebLink
sa;. �:M <br /> 2 <br /> Noun) <br /> lav '�5. 1991 <br /> :;I�11-1Vest. Inc.. water ieveis were rllcasured in the pre existing �s'el1S, le <br /> :measurements verified that groundwater flows in a south, soULhNvesteriy <br /> as a result <br /> ciirecLion. The gradient was toullol LO vary t of tidally induced <br /> water level fluctuations in the nearby Stockton deep water channel. <br /> �',,,,,.iusianG •;nd i��cemmcncitL i s <br /> The extent of the released gasoline appears to be limited both ar allY and <br /> �.vith depth. 'File maximum lateral extent of affected soil and groundwater <br /> is approximately 30 feet in a downgradienL direction from the tank (see <br /> €"igure l). <br /> The maximum concentrations encountered were at or near the <br /> groundwater surface, then decreased quickly with depth. The limiting <br /> factor for downward migration therefore was the presence of groundwater <br /> at a shallow depth. <br /> San Joaquin County's next required phase of work is the preparation of a <br /> Problem Assessment Report (PAR). ERM-West, Inc. understands that the <br /> County has requested Catellus Develop e ERM-West,Corporation <br /> submit <br /> it a P that <br /> by June 17, 1991 (copy of letter enc <br /> an initial step in addressing the request, the results of the latest fieldwork <br /> should be released to the Cnnnty. And at the same time, open discussions <br /> with the County regarding their zoncerns and potential clean-up <br /> dards <br /> for the site. <br /> Secondly, ERM-West, Inc. recommends that the County be approached <br /> about postponing the June 17th deadline, pending the removal of two <br /> additional underground storage tanks. If problems are encountered with <br /> r those tanks, one Problem Assessment Report addressing all three sites <br /> instead of three reports would be more cost effective. <br /> Well Cnstru tion <br /> Two monitoring wells were constructed by ERM-West, Inc. on April 12. <br /> 1991. The wells, labeled-.,%,nW-4 and MW-5 were located hydraulically <br /> downgradient from the tank site and within the tank site respectively (see <br /> Figure 1). The soil borings at c:ch location were drilled to 30 feet and <br /> sampled at 5 foot intervals. A portion of the sample at each depth interval <br /> was preserved for subsequent laboratory analyses. The remainder of the <br /> sampled soiI5 were used for classification according to the Unified Soil <br /> Classification System (see enclosed boring logs) and for preliminary <br /> screening by head space analysis. <br /> After the borings were advanced to a depth of 30 feet, they were completed <br /> flush <br /> - <br /> as monitoring wells. The wells were constructed of 2-inch diameter, <br /> threaded, Schedule 40 PVC. The well screen was set ata depth <br /> t erva30 feet <br /> l of <br /> approximately 10 to..15.feet..__The.-remainder of the boring, n <br /> r was filled with sand. At the ground surface both- vells were-covered-wit - - - <br /> -- traffic boxes. <br />