Laserfiche WebLink
September 12,2019 <br /> FOR: San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department(EHD) <br /> 1868 Hazelton Ave. <br /> Stockton,CA 95205 RECEIVED <br /> PROJECT: Wat Dhammararam Heaven Temple Project <br /> 3732 East Carpenter Road SEP 1; 2019 <br /> Stockton, California 95215 <br /> APN: 179-160-50, SR0080912 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> SUBJECT: Soil Suitability/Nitrate Loading Studies Report Addendum <br /> Reference is made to the Studies I completed for the project referenced above and the comments <br /> letter received from EHD found in Appendix D. The first question raised is in regards to the <br /> Precipitation Data in Table 4, Page 5. The Soil Survey Table 1: Temperature and Precipitation <br /> Chart is found in Appendix A. There is an"Average" column in the Precipitation category. The <br /> "Average"Precipitation column totals 14.19 inches,the"Less Than" column totals 8.3 inches <br /> and the "More Than"column totals 18.92 inches. While it is true the "More Than" column totals <br /> 23.47 and not 18.92,this is because when the differences between the "More Than"months (as <br /> listed) and the"Average"months are determined, this is added back to the "Average"totals,then <br /> the real total is found; the same for the"Less Than"column. This number(18.92 inches) is used <br /> just to demonstrate that the rainfall can be significantly higher than the average. <br /> The comment was made from Paragraph 2: "The average precipitation values should be used in <br /> the nitrate loading analysis instead of the"2 years in 10 value listed in Table 4." I did use the <br /> "average precipitation values" in the nitrate loading analysis. The San Joaquin County <br /> Department of Public Works Isohyetal Map of Mean Annual Precipitation(Appendix B) and the <br /> Soil Survey: Figure 3: The average annual precipitation, in inches, San Joaquin County(Appendix C) <br /> both illustrate that the average annual precipitation at the project site is actually around 13.5 inches per <br /> year; but I used 13.0 inches,which is more conservative. <br /> The comment from Paragraph 3: The Estimated Recharge Value. The CIMIS value referenced is invalid. <br /> The Manteca CIMIS monitoring station is almost 10 miles to the south and in an area with an average <br /> rainfall of 1 I inches. I give several presentations a year through the University of California on irrigation <br /> and the use of CIMIS, and I discuss in detail the use of a station which must be carefully analyzed when <br /> it is not in close proximity to a subject acreage. <br /> The author of"Attachment 1" states that"Note that the key difference is expressing the recharge <br /> factors (wastewater and rainfall percolation) in acre-feet per year(AFY), rather thaninches per <br /> averaged over the development-recharge area." But they are equivalent! AFY volume is the <br /> same as cu ft/yr volume; with cu ft/yr units reduced to in/yr. <br /> Page 1 of 3 <br /> Y.C.53ax 3794 + J unea&,CQ 95381 + (20)402-1652 + ddche6neopiaxtaitet <br />