My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004288
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEST RIPON
>
12455
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0200625
>
SU0004288
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2019 11:44:17 AM
Creation date
12/5/2019 11:27:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004288
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0200625
STREET_NUMBER
12455
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WEST RIPON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIPON
ENTERED_DATE
5/17/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
12455 E WEST RIPON RD
RECEIVED_DATE
12/24/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�' RECEIVED <br /> H. THOMAS BECK � p <br /> ATTORNEY AT LAW 7 2004 <br /> § Comm'nity Development Dept <br /> 1180 W.MAIN STREET,SUITE 2 TEL: (209)599-5860 <br /> RIPON,CA 95366-3005 FAX: (209)599-5052 <br /> September 24, 2004 <br /> Kerry Sullivan <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Community Development Department <br /> 1810 E. Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, CA 95205-8232 <br /> RE: Site Approval Application No. PA-02-625 <br /> Dear Ms. Sullivan: <br /> I wrote to you on June 23, 2004 regarding the masonry wall that is to be erected along the <br /> property line between the VFW property and Janet Spyksma-Pilchard's property. I have <br /> not received a response from you. Is that typical? I assumed that you would respond in <br /> some way to my letter. Has anything been done to enforce the condition of approval <br /> regarding the solid masonry wall along her property line? <br /> I was given a copy of the July 2, 2004 letter you sent to the Board of Supervisors. You <br /> refer to the complaints registered by Ms. Spyksma-Pilchard, and refer to the conditions of <br /> approval,but you draw no conclusions and make no recommendations. Are you <br /> suggesting in your report that the Board approve the conditions of the property and the <br /> actions of the VFW, in spite of the violations of the conditions of approval? <br /> Please respond to the following Conditions of Approval: <br /> Lb states the use is approved for"use as a VFW Post." What does that mean? VFW <br /> member functions? VFW member social gatherings?Public swap meets? Rental of the <br /> facility for weddings? Shouldn't there be some specification as to what is included in <br /> the use as a VFW Post? In your report under"Facility rental"you state "there is no way <br /> to confirm that the facility was rented to the general public..." Isn't a permit required for <br /> a public use of the property? Is the VFW required to keep record of the special events <br /> held on the property? Section Lo states four outdoor special events per year are allowed <br /> with a permit for each event. Is there record of a permit for the grand opening of the <br /> facility in May, or for the wedding on June 19, 2004? What has been done to investigate <br /> the complaints of my clients? <br /> l.d.(2) requires barricades to keep all areas not used for parking free from traffic. Has <br /> this condition been fulfilled? My client has reported trucks parked on top of the dirt pile <br /> near her property. Is this now barricaded? As to the dirt pile, do you consider this part of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.