My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007887
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
1325
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545007
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007887
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2019 2:30:56 PM
Creation date
12/5/2019 1:43:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007887
RECORD_ID
PR0545007
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0025604
FACILITY_NAME
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
1325
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1325 W WEBER AVE
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
water table, and may not be effective in the clayey soils found at both <br /> saes The low permeability of the clayey soil makes the extraction <br /> process difficult and time-consuming To make the process effective, <br /> more wells would be required, increasing the cost of the alternative <br /> Even with the additional wells, treatment in clayey soils may not be <br />' sufficient For these reasons, vapor extraction was eliminated as an <br /> alternative for the site <br /> Bioremediation <br /> Bioremediation is a treatment alternative that can be used for <br /> remediating soil affected by hydrocarbons The affected soils would be <br /> excavated and treated at the site After treatment is complete, the clean <br />' soil could be backfilled into the excavation <br /> Several soil bioremediation methods are available, including <br /> landfarming and treatment cells In landfarming, the soil is spread out <br /> over the ground to a depth of 12 inches, moistened, and periodically <br /> tilled with conventional agricultural equipment to provide aeration <br /> The addition of water and oxygen stimulates the natural microbes and <br /> increases the rate of natural biodegradation (which is generally on- <br /> going at any site having petroleum hydrocarbons in soil) Microbial <br /> activity can be further stimulated by adding fertilizer <br /> Loss of volatile hydrocarbons through aeration occurs during <br /> landfarming activities, and it is therefore difficult to distinguish <br /> between treatment results achieved by biodegradation and those <br /> achieved through volatilization/aeration Therefore, the <br /> implementation of a bioremediation strategy only adds to the costs of <br /> the aeration alternative Thus, landfarming has no advantages over <br /> on-site aeration and was eliminated from consideration <br /> The use of treatment cells allows for better control of soil moisture, <br /> temperature, and nutrient and oxygen content than does landfarrning <br /> Because treatment cells are fully enclosed, commercial (non-native) <br /> microbes can be used to accelerate the biodegradation process <br /> Treatment cells are expensive to construct and offer no significant <br /> benefits for compounds, such as petroleum hydrocarbons, that are <br /> simple to biodegrade Therefore, treatment cells were eliminated from <br /> further consideration <br /> Chemical Neutralization <br /> Chemical neutralization involves treating the soils to neutralize the <br /> compounds present Neutralization is only used for soils affected by <br /> 4-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.