Laserfiche WebLink
09/02 '00 WIED 16 52 FAX 10259469966 ER14iFPEST WC [A 013 <br /> Memorandums. <br /> Environmental <br /> Ttesomeuixres <br /> Management <br /> To., Jim Adams,Catellus Development Corporation 1777 Botelbo Dnve <br /> Suite 260 <br /> From: ,Arai►Chembu3rkar,P E.,Project Engineer walnut creek,CA 94596 <br /> (925)946-0455 <br /> Date: 9 February, 2000 (925)946-9%8(tax) <br /> Subject: Predictive Calculations- <br /> Former Tank Sites #1 and#2 1 <br /> 1515 and 1325 West Weber Avenue, <br /> Stockton,California ' <br /> RM, <br /> In response to a Regional Water Quality Control Board request, <br /> Environmental resources Management (ERM) has performed predictive <br /> calculations to estunate the tune required for natural biodegradation to <br /> reduce chemicals of concern(COCl)in site:ground water to levels <br /> complying with relevant regulatory standards or goals <br /> During the most went ground water morutormg event(22 July 1999),a <br /> total of five wells reported chennical detectaicm,s, rine well at"Lank Site #1 <br /> and four wells at Tank Site#2. Chenucal detections included TPH-g, <br /> TEPH Unknown Hydrocarbon, MTBE, 1,2-DCA, benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbeanxene, and total xylenes. In the predictive caIculataons,ERM <br /> moused on benzene and'1'PH as primary COCl The detections of toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene,and total xylenes are not an issue as they were all below <br /> state Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLS) The one detechon of MT'FE <br /> is also not an issue because it is below the California Environmental <br /> Protection Ayg ncy's proposed Primary MCL for MTBE. Concentrations of <br /> TEPH were lour and therefore,not a concern One well at Site#1 and four <br /> wells at Site#2 reported detections of 1,2-DCA above state MCI.s <br /> However,this conVound was excluded from the predictive calculations <br /> because it was not analyzed in ground water monitoring events prior to <br /> the 22 July 1999 event. <br /> MvM 5 at Site#1 and MW-I A and MW-2A at Site #2 were the three wells <br /> with detections exceeding the state MCL for benzene.TPH-g does not <br /> have an established.MCL,so ERMM used 1 part per million as a reasonable <br /> target for purposes of this assesarnent MW-1A at Site #2 was the only <br /> well with a detection higher than the target for TPH-g <br /> ERM applied the predictive calculations presented in this memorandum <br /> to data from the well at each site that had exhibited the rnaximurrn <br /> detection above the MCL/Target Concentration (MW-5 and MW TA at <br /> • Sites#1. and #2,respectively) To,assew natural biodegradation constants, <br /> a <br />