My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007924
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
1325
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545007
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007924
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2019 2:44:16 PM
Creation date
12/5/2019 2:19:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007924
RECORD_ID
PR0545007
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0025604
FACILITY_NAME
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
1325
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1325 W WEBER AVE
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
411 BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY <br /> As described in Sections 2 and 3, soil and limited ground water <br /> remediation was completed at Sites #1 and #2 These remediation <br /> ' activities were identified following a remedial technology screening and <br /> alternative development and evaluation process, as detailed in the Final <br /> Remediation Plan for Former Storage Tanks Located at .1325 and 1515 West <br /> ' Weber Avenue - Stockton, California (ERM, September 1993) This <br /> remediation plan was approved by PHS/EHD, and the implementation <br /> activities were overseen by PHS/EHD representatives This section <br /> discusses the use of the best available technology (BAT) in those <br /> remediation activities <br /> 4.1 SOIL REMEDIATION <br />' Soil excavation and on-site aeration were selected as the BAT for <br />' remediation at the West Weber Avenue sites The soils at the sites have <br /> low permeabilities and high moisture contents This combination <br /> prevents the effective use of other conventional technologies, such as in- <br /> situ soil vapor extraction Therefore,soil excavation was the BAT for the <br /> sites <br /> ERM was unable to attain "background" soil concentrations in portions of <br /> both Site #1 and #2 using soil excavation At the time of soil excavation <br /> activities, warehouses were present on the areas of suspected TPH impact, <br />' and the soil could not be removed directly beneath and adjacent to the <br /> buildings <br /> 4.2 GROUND WATER REMEDIATION <br />' Two technologies were used in remediation activities at the sites As <br /> discussed in Sections 2 7 and 3 7, ground water extraction was evaluated <br />' at the sites and found to be an ineffective technology for remediating site <br /> ground water Subsequently, ORC socks were used as an in situ <br />' technology for ground water remediation ORC has shown to be effective <br /> at increasing chemical degradation in site ground water However, as <br /> noted above, the biodegradation capacity of site conditions is more than <br />' adequate to address the low levels of TPH and BTEX constituents <br /> currently present in ground water, with or without the continued addition <br /> of ORC Therefore, although background conditions have not been <br /> achieved at this time, naturaIIy occurring biodegradation activities will <br /> ERM 19 CAL LLLUS/2996 10-10/13/99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.