Laserfiche WebLink
(100 mg/kg for TPH) was attained at the excavation sidewalls and bottom <br /> or until building structures prevented further excavation <br />' Prior to backfilling, the saturated bottom of the excavation was stabilized <br /> by placing a 4-foot-thick rock base, consisting of 1- to 2-inch-diameter <br /> rock, over a geotextile fabric liner The excavation was then backfilled <br />' with clean fill dirt and compacted using construction equipment The <br /> backfill area was subsequently paved with asphalt cover <br /> 1 <br /> Additional Characterization <br /> As discussed above, in September 1994, Catellus conducted additional soil <br /> sampling within the former excavation footprint and underneath the <br /> 1 existing building to verify that residual hydrocarbon concentrations, if <br /> present in site soils, would not pose a significant risk to human health and <br /> the environment The results of the additional characterization activities <br />' were presented in the Environmental Conditions Report (ERM, July 1995) <br /> The data collected during this investigation verified the accuracy of the <br /> 1993 excavation confirmation sampling and supported the 1993 <br /> confirmation sampling results that indicated that soils exceeding the TPH <br /> cleanup goal had been excavated Figure 3-2, which is reproduced from <br /> the July 1995 report, illustrates the TPH concentrations detected in soils in <br /> the former Tank Site #2 area <br /> The data indicated that a limited volume of soils containing TPH at levels <br /> higher than the 100 mg/kg cleanup goal were present beneath the <br /> building at Former Tank Site #2 within the interval of approximately 5 to <br />' 11 feet bgs The estimated extent of these elevated TPH detections is <br /> f-- illustrated in Figure 3-3 The total estimated volume of TPH-impacted soil <br /> beneath the former warehouse footprint is approximately 210 cubic yards <br /> Ground Water Monitoring and Extraction Events <br />' The originally selected ground water remedial alternative for Former <br /> Tank Site #2 involved extraction of a fixed volume of hydrocarbon- <br /> containing ground water from existing monitoring wells Ground water <br /> was extracted from monitoring well MW-1A during three events <br /> December 1993/January 1994, May 1994, and September 1994 The <br />' ground water extracted during each event was pumped into Baker tanks <br /> for temporary storage and subsequently transported via vacuum trucks to <br /> the City of Stockton Publicly-Owned Treatment Works (POTW) for direct <br />' discharge In October 1996, oxygen regenerating compounds (ORC) were <br /> • <br /> 3-7 <br />