My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
1320
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0012831
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2019 4:38:15 PM
Creation date
12/5/2019 4:20:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0012831
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004036
FACILITY_NAME
UNION ICE/DONS DISTRIBUTION
STREET_NUMBER
1320
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14519013
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1320 W WEBER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
from WHF's ground-water samples were biased on the high side, due to the presence of <br /> chromium adsorbed to suspended sediment in their ground-water samples. <br /> Levineā¢Fricke's recent investigation was designed to collect representative analytical data <br /> on dissolved total and hexavalent chrome in ground water samples collected from three <br /> downgradient monitoring wells and two upgradient (or background) wells. <br /> SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION <br /> Our scope of work consisted of ground-water sampling and laboratory analyses of the <br /> ground-water samples, as described below. <br /> Ground-Water Sampling <br /> Ground-water samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-5S, MW-7S, MW-10, <br /> MW-11, and MW-12 (Figure 2). Monitoring wells MW-7S and MW-5S are located up- <br /> gradient and/or outside the potentially affected area and were used to collect background <br /> ground-water samples. Wells MW-10, MW-11, and MW-12 are directly downgradient of <br /> the suspected brine release area. <br /> A centrifugal pump was used to remove three well volumes of water from each well prior <br /> to sampling. Water clarity, pH, temperature, specific conductance, and extracted water <br /> volume were monitored during the purging process to confirm that the purge water <br /> physical parameters were stable prior to sample collection. <br /> Ground-water samples were collected using a steam-cleaned Teflon bailer, and <br /> immediately transferred into plastic bottles for chromium and general minerals analyses. <br /> One 250 ml and two 500 ml plastic bottles were filled with the sampled ground water <br /> from each monitoring well. Field filtering was performed on the samples used for <br /> dissolved metals analyses (one 250 ml bottle and one 500 ml bottle from each well) using <br /> a 0.45 micron filter. <br /> The 250 ml sample (used for the hexavalent chromium analysis) was chilled and delivered <br /> to the analytical laboratory unpreserved within 8 hours of sampling for laboratory <br /> analysis within 24 hours of sampling. The unfiltered 500 ml sample was chilled and <br /> delivered to the laboratory unpreserved within 8 hours of sampling, for analysis on a <br /> normal turnaround basis. The field-filtered 500 ml sample (used for major ion and total <br /> chromium analyses) was preserved with nitric acid and delivered to the laboratory within <br /> 8 hours of sampling for analysis on a normal turnaround basis. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.