My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0080749_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SUGAR
>
9375
>
4200/4300 - Liquid Waste/Water Well Permits
>
SR0080749_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2022 1:52:40 PM
Creation date
12/6/2019 10:30:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4200/4300 - Liquid Waste/Water Well Permits
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0080749
PE
4301
STREET_NUMBER
9375
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SUGAR
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95304
APN
21216017
ENTERED_DATE
6/14/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9375 W SUGAR RD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
likelihood that supplemental treatment would also be needed to overcome soil/percolation <br /> limitations in areas impacted by years of truck traffic.Recognition of the probable future <br /> need for supplemental treatment,and where it could be located,should be included in the <br /> plans and/or pen-nit documents,as clear notice to all parties. <br /> I would also note that the projected wastewater flows associated with maximum use of the <br /> facility indicate the possibility of exceeding 10,000 gpd,which would require review and <br /> potentially waste discharge permitting by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board. <br /> 3. Nitrate Loading Analysis. The revised nitrate loading analysis is consistent with my <br /> recommendations, and includes reasonable assumptions for runoff and groundwater recharge <br /> estimates. I noted an error in the calculation of the value of"R2"near the bottom of page 2. <br /> The total site acreage (45.67 acres)was used in place of the total runoff volume(36.08 ac- <br /> ft/yr),resulting in an overestimation of rainfall-recharge. Carried through,this results in an <br /> underestimation of the final nitrate-nitrogen,nr calculation(2.5 mg-N/L instead of 3.1 mg- <br /> NIL). This does not alter the final conclusion,which shows the projected nitrate-nitrogen <br /> loading to be safely within the threshold criterion of 10 mg-N/L. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.