Laserfiche WebLink
A ` <br /> Jerry Moore L, <br /> 5491 F Street, Banta, California <br /> Page 2of2 <br /> • A single well, located obliquely down-gradient to cross-gradient from the <br /> suspected source area will not be adequate to demonstrate dissolved plume <br /> stability; and <br /> • Asa practice, the EHD does not approve utilizing domestic wells as monitoring <br /> wells — real monitoring wells should be placed to detect encroaching plumes that <br /> potentially threaten domestic wells so there may be opportunity to take <br /> appropriate measures to protect such domestic wells before they are impacted. <br /> The proposals in the AEI Letter do not address the fundamental directive of the EHD <br /> letter of 11 April 2007 regarding the CPT groundwater analytical data, namely to confirm <br /> the presence and identify the chemicals the laboratory reported as TPH-mo, but also <br /> reported as not matching the typical pattern of TPH-mo. This is an important step; if the <br /> substance detected and reported is determined to not be related to your unauthorized <br /> underground storage tank (UST) system releases, this agency will not direct further <br /> investigation of it. If the substance is determined to be probably related to your UST <br /> system releases, the finding will be the technical justification for additional investigation <br /> and characterization of the plume. <br /> The AEI Letter also contained a proposal to "revise the installation plans for MW-15 to <br /> drill the monitoring well to a depth of 100 feet bsg. Placing MW-15 to a depth of 100 feet <br /> bsg will allow..." The EHD is not certain whether this change is merely to advance the <br /> boring to 100 feet bsg, then back fill the boring and build the well to the originally <br /> proposed 20 feet bsg, or if AEI now proposes to set the bottom of the well screen at 100 <br /> feet bsg. A clarifying proposed well construction diagram was not provided. The EHD <br /> points out that the original justification for installing MW-15, which was to delineate the <br /> shallow dissolved plume toward the northeast, must still be satisfied. The EHD cannot <br /> approve this proposal without clarification. Provide the clarification to the EHD by 02 July <br /> 2007. <br /> Questions or comments may be directed to Nuel Henderson at (209)468-3436. <br /> Donna Heran, RENS, Director <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> Nuel C. Henderson, Jr., PG Margar Lagorio, RETS <br /> Engineering Geologist Program Coordinator <br /> Unit IV- Site Mitigation Unit IV—Site Mitigation <br /> C: James LL Barton, PG —CVRWQCB <br /> Daniel Lafontaine, PE—Chemical Engineer—APEX Envirotech, Inc. <br />