My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011803
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
F
>
5491
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545028
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011803
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2019 5:10:48 PM
Creation date
12/6/2019 3:51:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011803
RECORD_ID
PR0545028
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003919
FACILITY_NAME
VAN DE POL ENTERPRISES
STREET_NUMBER
5491
STREET_NAME
F
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
BANTA
Zip
95304
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
5491 F ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Risk-Based Corrective Action Assessment& Over-Excavation Request <br /> Moore Petroleum,Inc.,5491 'T'Street,Banta,CA <br /> Page 4 <br /> with current U.S. EPA guidelines. In order to apply the GSI System to RBCA evaluation in <br /> California, several chemical-specific parameters in the system were adjusted. The benzene cancer <br /> slope factor was adjusted from 0.029 (mg/kg/day)-' to 0.1 (mg/kg/day)-'. The diesel cancer slop <br /> factor was also added into the GSI System. The most recent California drinking water Maximum <br /> Contaminant Levels for BTEX and MTBE were also updated in the model. <br /> Under complete exposure pathways, the Tier I GSI modeling compares affected media <br /> concentrations of constituents of concern (COCs) to conservative, generic Tier 1 Look-Up Table <br /> values (RBSLs) based on possible risk to human health and the environment. A constituent <br /> reduction factor (CRF) can be assigned to a specific COC. The CRF value can be calculated as <br /> the ratio of the source concentration for that COC divided by the RBSL for that COC. <br /> Constituents with a calculated CRF value less than one require no reduction to meet excess risk <br /> limits. For CDCs with CRF values exceeding one, the relative magnitude of the CRF is indicative <br /> of the degree of source remediation required. <br /> A RBCA Tier 2 evaluation under the GSI System takes into account site-specific data to assess <br /> whether the site is a risk to human health and the environment. In a Tier 2 evaluation, a <br /> concentration reduction factor (CRF) for a specific COC can be calculated as the ratio of the <br /> source concentration for that COC divided by the SSTL for that COC. Constituents with <br /> calculated CRF values less than one require no reduction to meet excess risk limits. For COCs <br /> with CRF values exceeding one, the relative magnitude of the CRF is indicative of the degree of <br /> source remediation required. <br /> Tier 2 GSI System Modeling Results <br /> This RBCA assessment used Tier 2 GSI model because several site-specific subsurface <br /> parameters are available. They are the average depth to groundwater, the approximate extents of <br /> the soil and groundwater impact, the average soil hydraulic conductivity and the average <br /> groundwater velocity. The soil TPHd and BTEX concentrations for soil sample MW-1 collected <br /> on April 28, 1989, and the groundwater TPHd concentration for groundwater sample MW-1 <br /> collected on January 16, 1998, were used in the modeling. <br /> The complete exposure pathways included in the Tier 2 GSI System modeling are: groundwater <br /> ingestion, soil leaching to groundwater ingestion, volatilization of soil to outdoor air, and <br /> volatilization of groundwater to outdoor or indoor air. The groundwater ingestion pathways are <br /> modeled in a residential setting, all other pathways were evaluated under a commercial setting. <br /> The Tier 2 GSI System modeling results indicate that due to the existence of the groundwater <br /> ingestion pathways, the site soil and groundwater impact levels had exceeded the Tier 2 RBCA <br /> cleanup goals by a magnitude of 3 to 28,000. The Tier 2 GSI System modeling results are <br /> included in Appendix B. <br /> 1Y:D:1 PRO.TECTT-'STRA02 004-Moore Petroleum.Banta\Qmr0I98CRaBCAAssessment.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.