My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FILBERT
>
110
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545039
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2019 11:15:59 AM
Creation date
12/10/2019 10:07:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1
RECORD_ID
PR0545039
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0010186
FACILITY_NAME
DEL MONTE FOODS PLNT #33 - DISCO WH
STREET_NUMBER
110
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
FILBERT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15702009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
110 N FILBERT ST
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
322
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Ak A z, <br /> NOV 1 6 M9 <br /> ENV IRON;MENTAL HFAL T <br /> PERIP01IT/S <br /> E 17 <br /> Del Monte Foods,USA <br /> One Market Plaza <br /> PO. Box 3575, San Francisco,CA 94119 <br /> Telephone.(415)442-4000 <br /> November 13, 1989 <br /> Diane Hinson <br /> San Joaquin County Health Department <br /> P.O. Box 2009 <br /> 1601 Fast Hazelton Ave. <br /> ,,c,-K-ton, CA 95201 Ai <br /> Re: Removing Del Monte Plant A33 From Contaminated Site LiSt--Z-�/(,, F- Alom <br /> Dear Ms. Hinson: <br /> John Furr of Del Monte Plant #33 forwarded the package of information given <br /> to him by Carol Oz and requested MY assistance in this issue. I preferred to <br /> discuss this with you over the phone but Was told by Carol Oz last Friday <br /> that I had to do so in writing. <br /> I am very aware of Proposition 65 and was surprised to hear that Stockton <br /> Plant #33 was put on a Proposition 65 list of contaminated sites. I had <br /> never heard of a "Prop 65 list" even though I work with production facilities <br /> in seven California counties. I also did not realize there was contamination <br /> at Plant #33, nor was I aware of any conditions which might be construed as <br /> contamination under California Health and Safety Code Section 25180.7(b) <br /> which requires a federal enployee to report if an illegal discharge, or <br /> threatened illegal discharge, of hazardous wastes is revealed, and who knows <br /> the discharge, or a threatened discharge, is likely to cause substantial <br /> injury to the public health or safety (not the case as far as we know) . <br /> My surprise stems from what I know happened when the tanks were removed in <br /> the fall of 1985. We wanted to take all the proper steps required in <br /> removing the tanks so Exceltech was contracted to handle this project. From <br /> their Tank Excavation Report dated 12/10/85 of which you have a copy, the <br /> following are described: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.