Laserfiche WebLink
MEETING MINUTES <br /> DISCO PROPERTY DATA REVIEW AND FUTURE ACTIVITIES SCOPING <br /> February 11,1998 <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division <br /> Attendees: Ron Rowe/SJCEHD,Margaret Lagorio/SJCEHD,Richard Fish/Del Monte, <br /> Steve Ronzone/Del Monte,Nancy Bice/Geomatrix,Liz Dodge/CH2MHILL <br /> Minutes Prepared by Liz Dodge <br /> Additions and Corrections to these minutes should be conveyed to Richard Fish/Del <br /> Monte or Liz Dodge/CH2M HILL.If no changes are proposed by March 11,1998,these <br /> minutes will be assumed to be complete and correct. <br /> Ron Rowe described his impressions of the data summary and visualization package and <br /> identified the following data gaps: <br /> • Of the 33 boreholes drilled at the Disco Property,20 did not have chemical constituents <br /> analyzed for in soil. Ron indicated that more chemical data on soils were needed. <br /> Specifically,he noted that the soil gas survey data on Table 2 indicates that soils in the <br /> upper to 13 feet in the dispenser area are relatively clean and analytical data on soils <br /> are available from 6 wells at depths of 5 to 85 feet. However, Ron indicated that more <br /> soil analytical data is needed in the zones from 13 to 55 feet and greater than 85 feet <br /> below grade. Liz Dodge indicated that additional vadose zone sampling did not seem <br /> .%-arranted in the dispenser area,since no indication of a release was found during <br /> Ko"'.piping removal. Ron said that sampling in the saturated zone should have been <br /> performed in this area. e0w, <br /> • The cross sections did not show deeper wells MW-7D or MW-8D. He also said wells <br /> 1\1W-8S and MW-8D should have been included in cross section 3. <br /> • Ron felt more borings may be warranted between MW-8 and MW-2,below 80 feet <br /> below grade, although access is limited by the presence of Myrtle Street. <br /> • Table 3 -Ron asked about the high TPH concentrations listed as 3 feet below grade at <br /> the north Tank. Liz indicated that the table should indicate that the sample depths are <br /> feet below the bottom of the tank excavation. Ron noted that historical analytical data <br /> indicate highest concentrations in soil were observed near the north tank at 65-75 foot <br /> below grade interval <br /> • Ron felt geologic cross sections were"oversimplified" may need more detail. He asked <br /> if CH2M HILL instructed EMCON on how to draw the cross sections; Liz Dodge replied <br /> that EMCON was provided the boring logs and asked to use their best judgement. <br /> Ron noted that in the late 70's groundwater levels were 100 to 110 feet below grade,based <br /> on flood district maps, and therefore petroleum constituents may be present at this depth or <br />